Deficiency Index

Willow Brook Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center

Wilmington, Massachusetts · CCN 225568

25 surveys since 2011, 16 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
136
Surveys
25
Harm or worse
16
Immediate jeopardy
5
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy5

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file20/25

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
142
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES
County
Middlesex
Medicare-certified since
1993

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
2
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 96 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Massachusetts.

Last survey on record

Sep 12, 2025

423 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.683.59
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.65—
Annual nurse turnover43.2%34.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$10,358 across 1 penalty
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG11.8%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3664.3%E1526.8%F23.6%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B23.6%C—
CMS’s current file: 56 of the 136 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5503×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6563×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6843×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6863×

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

  • F6923×

    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Willow Brook Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Sep 12, 2025

    Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to keep one Resident (#45) free from neglect out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide incontinence care to Resident #45 for a total of 10 hours and assisted him/her with a meal while lying in soiled incontinent briefs, resulting in a new skin impairment to the left buttock. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse and Neglect - Clinical Protocol, dated March 2018, indicated the following:-Neglect as defined at 483.5 means the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress.-Along with staff and management, the… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF943Sep 8, 2023

    Based on document review and interview, for 9 out of 9 sampled employee personnel files the facility failed to provide annual abuse training for their staff, as required and per facility policy. Specifically, the facility failed to provide in-servicing that included resident abuse prohibition training. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse review date 10/23/22 included the following: Training: -Facility personnel will be trained on hire at orientation, bi-annually and as needed on an on going basis Prevention: -The facility will provide staff on orientation, annually and as determined, information on how and to whom they may report concerns, incidents, and grievances without fear of retribution. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF947Sep 8, 2023

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 5 of 5 staff reviewed received 12 hours of mandatory in-service training in a year. Findings include: Review of 5 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) employee records indicated that 5 out of 5 employees did not complete the mandatory 12 hours of education required. During an interview on 9/8/23 at 12:30 P.M., The Director of Nursing and the Human Resources Representative said the facility attempted to locate staff training records and could not find any proof that the required in-service training had been done by staff. During interviews on 9/8/23 between 1:36 P.M., and 1:44 P.M., CNA #3, CNA #4, and CNA #6 said they have not received any in-service education in the past 2 years. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF677Sep 12, 2025

    Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for 3 Residents (#45, #109, and #7) out of a total sample of 28. Specifically;1.) For Resident #45 the facility failed to provide incontinence care for the entirety of an over-night shift and the start of the morning shift, equaling a total of ten hours, resulting in skin breakdown;2.) For Resident #109 the facility failed to ensure cueing or assistance was provided for meals, resulting in Resident #109 eating 4 of 4 meals, that were not finger foods, with his/her hands; and 3.) For Resident #7, the facility failed to provide assistance with meals. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF686Sep 12, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary treatment, services, and/or interventions to promote healing and prevent new ulcers from developing for four Residents (#45, #2, #17, and #23), who had pressure ulcers, out of 28 total sampled residents. Specifically,1a.) For Resident #45, the facility failed to implement a wound intervention resulting in deterioration of wound,1b.) For Resident #45, the facility failed to ensure staff provided prompt incontinence care to prevent new skin breakdown,2a.) For Resident #2, the facility failed to address and implement wound clinic recommendations for pressure ulcers to right and left buttocks, 2b.) For Resident #2, the facility failed to assess and document the measurements of the right and left… […]

Read 35 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 35 of 136 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Sep 12, 2025Standard12 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 28, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 19, 2024Standard18 findings
  • Mar 19, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 8, 2023Standard24 findings
  • Feb 22, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 11, 2022Standard12 findings
  • Jun 7, 2022Complaint1 finding
Show the 17 earlier surveys
  • Dec 14, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Sep 26, 2019Standard6 findings
  • Nov 16, 2018Standard10 findings
  • Jan 10, 2018Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 25, 2017Standard9 findings · 2 harm
  • Feb 13, 2017Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Sep 28, 2016Standard7 findings
  • Feb 29, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 12, 2016Complaint6 findings · 5 harm
  • Aug 17, 2015Standard5 findings
  • May 5, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 8, 2014Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Jun 5, 2014Standard2 findings
  • May 14, 2013—1 finding
  • Jun 7, 2012—2 findings
  • Nov 29, 2011—3 findings · 3 harm
  • Jun 2, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction