Care One at Randolph
Randolph, Massachusetts · CCN 225356
23 surveys since 2011, 8 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 138
- Surveys
- 23
- Harm or worse
- 8
- Immediate jeopardy
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 168
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- CAREONE
- County
- Norfolk
- Medicare-certified since
- 1989
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 96 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Massachusetts.
Last survey on record
Aug 14, 2025
452 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.56 | 3.59 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.45 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 23.3% | 34.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G11.7% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3761.7% | E1931.7% | F23.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B11.7% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6586×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F5804×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F6564×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F5523×
Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
- F8043×
Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Care One at Randolph, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF688May 24, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor and prevent a left knee contracture from developing after resident completed the initial course of physical therapy for one Resident (#106), out of a total sample of 28 residents. Findings include: Resident #106 was admitted to the facility in October 2022 with a diagnosis of stroke with hemiplegia (paralysis) of the left side. The Resident's Health Care Proxy (HCP) was activated on 11/5/22. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/25/23, indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 out of 15 which indicated the Resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Section G0400 Functional limitation in range of motion for the lower extremity: No impairment. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF760Mar 6, 2023
Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of five sampled residents (Resident #1), whose physicians orders included Creon (Pancrelipase, prescription medication used to treat people who cannot digest food normally because their pancreas does not make enough enzymes), the Facility failed to ensure he/she was free from a significant medication error, when on 2/18/23, 2/19/23, and 2/20/23, although nursing documented that Resident #1 was administered Creon, the medication was unavailable and not delivered to the Facility until 2/21/23, and could not have been administered. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF925Dec 4, 2024
Based on records reviewed, interviews and for two of three unit kitchenettes, the facility failed to ensure they maintained a pest free environment, when live and dead cockroaches were observed during an environmental tour on the units. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy, titled Pest Control, dated as revised May 2008, indicated the Facility maintains an on-going pest control program to ensure the building is kept free of insects and rodents. Review of the Pest Control Site Inspection Report, dated 11/01/24, indicated that there were cockroaches: -on monitors (location not specified); -behind the freezer (location not specified); -by the cart storage area (location not specified). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 24, 2023
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the nourishment kitchenettes were maintained in a clean sanitary manner to prevent potential foodborne illness for 4 out of 4 nourishment kitchenettes. Findings include: On 5/22/2023 at 3:37 P.M., the surveyor toured the four kitchenettes and made the following observations: 3 East Unit nourishment kitchenette: -Shelves that stored the bottles of juices and soda was sticky with a thick layer gelled type of liquid. -Styrofoam take out container on top of the microwave, not labeled or dated. -Floor was sticky with visible food particles and dirt. 3 [NAME] Unit nourishment kitchenette: -Beside the refrigerator was a sticky pest trap with a cockroache and sugar pack stuck to it and paper trash. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF565Aug 14, 2025
Based on review of Resident Council Minutes, a resident group meeting, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure grievances brought forward from the Resident Council were addressed and promptly resolved to ensure the residents felt their concerns were acted upon timely and included the facility response to the group.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Council, last revised February 2021, indicated but was not limited to the following:-The purpose of the Resident Council is to provide a forum for: -residents, families and resident representatives to have input in the operation of the facility; -discussion of concerns and suggestions for improvement; -consensus building and communication between residents and facility staff; and… […]
Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 138 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 14, 2025Standard21 findings
- May 27, 2025Complaint3 findings
- Mar 20, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Dec 4, 2024Complaint3 findings
- Oct 9, 2024Complaint4 findings
- Aug 15, 2024Standard11 findings
- May 29, 2024Complaint2 findings
- May 24, 2023Standard15 findings · 1 harm
Show the 15 earlier surveys
- Mar 6, 2023Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 13, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Dec 1, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Nov 8, 2019Standard9 findings
- Nov 20, 2018Standard12 findings
- Jan 18, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Sep 15, 2017Complaint7 findings · 3 harm
- Jun 14, 2017Standard8 findings
- Jun 7, 2016Standard11 findings
- Feb 25, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Feb 24, 2015Standard1 finding
- Dec 10, 2013—8 findings
- Sep 14, 2012—4 findings · 2 harm
- Feb 16, 2012—1 finding
- Jul 27, 2011—10 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction