White Acres Wellness & Rehabilitation
El Paso, Texas · CCN 675025
31 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2014.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 110
- Surveys
- 31
- Harm or worse
- 4
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 74
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT
- County
- El Paso
- Medicare-certified since
- 1992
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 164 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Texas.
Last survey on record
Jun 16, 2026
146 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.32 | 3.22 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.60 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 50.0% | 53.9% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2253.7% | E1741.5% | F24.9% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6563×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6773×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F6953×
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at White Acres Wellness & Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Dec 13, 2022
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #4) of 5 reviewed for transfers. On 11/30/22 CNA B transferred Resident #4 improperly and Resident #4 sustained a fracture to her clavicle. This failure resulted in actual harm to Resident #4 on 11/30/22. It was determined to be past non-compliance due to the facility having implemented action that corrected the non-compliance prior to the beginning of the investigation. This failure could place residents at risk for an accident and potential harm. Findings include: Review of Resident #4's face sheet dated 12/13/22 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Mar 29, 2021
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remains free of accident hazards as is possible and each resident receives adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #1) of 7 residents reviewed for supervision to prevent accidents. The facility failed to ensure that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A followed the MDS and facility care plan on mobility and transfers for Resident #1. This failure caused Resident #1 to sustain a fall that resulted in an acute femoral neck fracture. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Oct 16, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 (#1) kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation and food storage. 1. -The facility failed to keep the tile floors free of black grease build-up in the dry storage room. 2. -The facility failed to store foods in the dry storage room in sealed containers. 3. -The facility failed to keep food containers free of grease build up, and food particles in the dry storage room. 4. -The facility failed to keep the Sheet Pan Rack in the dry storage room free of stains, dust accumulation directly above the casters. 5. -The facility failed to store food cans separately from chemicals. 6. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 24, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for professional standards for food service safety. The following were observed: -1 unlabeled package of sliced wheat bread observed on shelf under steam table. -1 unlabeled package of 4 hamburger buns observed on shelf in dry storage room. -1 bottle of vanilla icing dated ,d+[DATE]. These failures could place residents at risk of food-borne illness. Findings included: Observation on [DATE] at 8:57 AM of kitchen revealed a package of sliced wheat bread on a shelf under steam table. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF558Jan 29, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were provided services with reasonable accommodation of needs and preferences for 3 of 12 residents (Residents #24, #25, and #68) reviewed for call lights. The facility failed to ensure resident call lights were within reach for Residents #24, #25, and #68 on 01/27/2026. This failure placed residents at risk of having their needs unmet when they were unable to contact staff.Findings included Resident #24 Record review of Resident #24's face-sheet dated 01/29/2026, revealed an [AGE] year-old female with initial admission date of 08/21/2025, and re-admission date of 12/27/2025. […]
Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 110 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 16, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jun 5, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jan 29, 2026Standard11 findings
- Nov 14, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Aug 18, 2025Complaint3 findings
- Mar 13, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jan 8, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Oct 16, 2024Standard5 findings
Show the 23 earlier surveys
- Sep 27, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Mar 15, 2024Complaint5 findings
- Aug 24, 2023Standard and complaint9 findings
- Dec 13, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jul 8, 2022Standard1 finding
- Aug 10, 2021Complaint2 findings
- May 14, 2021Standard and complaint6 findings
- Mar 29, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 9, 2020Standard4 findings
- Sep 4, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Feb 1, 2019Standard4 findings
- Oct 18, 2018Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 30, 2018Complaint3 findings
- Dec 21, 2017Standard2 findings
- Feb 2, 2017Standard10 findings
- Feb 26, 2016Standard8 findings
- Jan 9, 2015Standard7 findings
- Oct 10, 2014Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 10, 2014—1 finding
- Jan 31, 2013—1 finding
- Dec 9, 2011—4 findings
- Aug 29, 2011—4 findings
- Oct 1, 2010—6 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction