North Houston Transitional Care
Houston, Texas · CCN 676434
11 surveys since 2017. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2021.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 22
- Surveys
- 11
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 70
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- PACS GROUP
- County
- Harris
- Medicare-certified since
- 2017
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 164 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Texas.
Last survey on record
May 21, 2026
172 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.92 | 3.22 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.47 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 71.3% | 53.9% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $11,508 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K225.0% | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D562.5% | E112.5% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at North Houston Transitional Care, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF580Aug 20, 2024
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately inform or consult with the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status (that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complication) for 1 of 10 residents (CR #1) reviewed for physician notification. LVN A failed to notify or seek clinical guidance from CR #1's physician, or any physician when she observed him in respiratory distress and had an oxygen saturation (blood oxygen level) of 73% upon admission to the facility from a rehabilitation hospital on [DATE]. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF684Aug 20, 2024
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 of 10 residents (CR #1) reviewed for quality of care. LVN A accepted and retained a new admission from a rehabilitation hospital, CR #1, who was actively in respiratory distress with an oxygen saturation of 73% on [DATE], at approximately 12:30 p.m. and failed to monitor and assess him frequently throughout the rest of her shift (6:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. and 2:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m.) after she administered 5L of oxygen and assumed his condition was stable. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF773Oct 12, 2021
Based on interview and record review the facility failed promptly notify the ordering physician of laboratory results that fell outside of clinical reference ranges in accordance with facility policies and procedures for notification of a practitioner or per the ordering physician's orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The facility failed to immediately notify CR #1's physician when a STAT lab was ordered in response to a reported change in condition from the residents' Responsible Party and lab results showed high WBC, BUN, and BUN/Creatinine ratio. The out of range laboratory results were not reported to the physician until 12 hours after they were resulted causing a delay in treatment. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Aug 21, 2021
Based on observation, interviews, record review, review of facility policy, and review of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) QSO 20-39-NH, the facility failed to suspend visitation upon the identification of a new COVID-19 outbreak on 08/20/21 until the first round of testing was complete and no new cases of COVID-19 was identified among staff and residents, and failed to implement the use of full Personal Protective Equipment (PPE- gown , gloves, eye protection, and N95 masks) when providing care for residents who had a potential exposure to a COVID positive staff on 08/20/21, and when providing care for one resident (Resident (R) 14) out of 32 residents on quarantine for COVID-19. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF886Aug 21, 2021
Based on interview, record review, review of policies and procedures, and review of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) QSO 20-38-NH Revised memo, the facility failed to implement outbreak testing of staff and residents to prevent the spread of COVID-19 upon identification that a student nurse tested positive for COVID-19 on 08/10/21. This failure increased the likelihood of COVID-19 transmission to the 62 residents living at the facility. Findings included: Record review of CMS QSO-20-38-NH, issued 08/26/20 and revised on 04/27/21, revealed that upon identification of a single new case of COVID-19 infection in any staff or residents, all staff and residents should be tested , regardless of vaccination status, and all staff and residents that tested negative should be… […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 22 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 19, 2026Complaint2 findings
- May 21, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Aug 28, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Aug 20, 2024Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
- Jul 2, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Feb 22, 2024Standard and complaint1 finding
- Dec 17, 2021Complaint3 findings
- Oct 12, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
Show the 3 earlier surveys
- Sep 17, 2021Standard3 findings
- Aug 21, 2021Complaint4 findings
- Sep 29, 2017Standard1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction