West Bend Health and Rehabilitation
West Bend, Iowa · CCN 165444
16 surveys since 2012, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 47
- Surveys
- 16
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 45
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- THE ENSIGN GROUP
- County
- Palo Alto · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 2001
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 137 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Iowa.
Last survey on record
Jun 25, 2026
137 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 2.94 | 3.63 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.59 | — |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2284.6% | E415.4% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6585×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6282×
Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
- F6572×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
- F6772×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at West Bend Health and Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684Jan 20, 2021
Based on staff interviews, chart reviews and policy review the facility failed to provide needed care or services by not notifying the resident's physician of acute decline in health status for one of three residents reviewed, (Resident #1) which resulted in immediate jeopardy to resident health and safety. Resident #1 had an emesis event on 9/30/20 at 7:30 pm and was visibly not feeling well. The resident was diaphoretic, pale, moaning, and breathing heavy. The resident had no bowel sounds at that time and was complaining about pain in her lower abdomen which was tender to the touch. Resident #1 was given Tylenol, a suppository, and an injection of [MEDICATION NAME] for comfort. The resident became lethargic but able to answer questions per her baseline. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF725Jan 12, 2024
Based on resident interview, resident council minutes and facility policy review the facility failed to answer resident call lights within the allotted professional standards of 15 minutes for 2 of 2 residents, (Resident #4 and #5). The facility identified a census of 40 residents. Findings include: During an interview on 1/5/24 at 8:49 a.m. a friend of Resident #4 indicated while she participated in a Zoom meeting with the resident on the computer she timed the resident's call light as on for 25 minutes. The resident had also told her she timed her call light on for 20 minutes up to 30 minutes at times. During an interview on 1/11/24 at 12:35 p.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657Dec 29, 2022
Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, the facility failed to revise a Care Plan for 4 of 4 residents reviewed (Residents #5, #31, #20, and #30). The facility reported a census of 38. Findings include: 1. Resident #5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS identified Resident #5 was independent with bed mobility, transfers, walking and toileting. Resident #5 used a walker and a wheelchair. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF801Dec 29, 2022
Based on facility record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure there was qualified staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to carry out food and nutrition services. Findings include: During an interview with the Administrator on 12/27/22 at 10:22 a.m.,she stated they had a Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) hired and that he was going to be starting 12/28/22. She stated that in the meantime, the assistant cook was fulfilling the requirements of the position until the newly hired CDM started. The Administrator stated that the assistant cook was CMD certified. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Dec 29, 2022
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and food handling practices to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness, to store dishes upside down to prevent contamination, failed to maintain dishwasher sanitizing parameters, failed to have properly cleaned equipment, and failed to have a Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) overseeing the kitchen. The facility census was 38 residents. Findings include: An initial tour of the kitchen conducted on [DATE] at 9:05 a.m., revealed the following items stored in the refrigerator ready for service: Plastic bottle of tartar sauce with no open date on bottle. Jar of pickles with no open date on jar. Generic plastic squeeze bottle with syrupy substance not labeled, no open date. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 47 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 25, 2026Standard2 findings
- May 1, 2025Standard6 findings
- Dec 16, 2024Complaint3 findings
- Mar 7, 2024Standard and complaint6 findings
- Jan 12, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jul 19, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Dec 29, 2022Standard7 findings
- Oct 3, 2022Complaint4 findings
Show the 8 earlier surveys
- Aug 12, 2021Standard3 findings
- Jan 20, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Sep 19, 2019Standard2 findings
- Jun 21, 2018Standard4 findings
- Aug 1, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Apr 1, 2015Standard and complaint4 findings
- Jan 16, 2014—1 finding
- Mar 6, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Regency Park Nursing & Rehab Center of JeffersonJefferson1 harm finding
- Accura Healthcare of Pomeroy, LLCPomeroy1 harm finding
- Greenfield Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterGreenfield1 harm finding
- Oakview Nursing & Rehablitation - MarionMarion2 harm findings
- Accura Healthcare of New HamptonNew Hamptonno harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction