Deficiency Index

Regency Park Nursing & Rehab Center of Jefferson

Jefferson, Iowa · CCN 165233

28 surveys since 2011, 8 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
100
Surveys
28
Harm or worse
8
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file21/28

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
46
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
CAMPBELL STREET SERVICES
County
Greene · rural
Medicare-certified since
1994

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 137 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Iowa.

Last survey on record

Jun 4, 2026

158 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.043.63
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.67—
Annual nurse turnover97.5%44.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG14.0%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1976.0%E520.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 25 of the 100 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F7613×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F6582×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F6952×

    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Regency Park Nursing & Rehab Center of Jefferson, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Nov 13, 2023

    Based on clinical record reviews, observations, resident, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate nursing supervision to prevent accident and injuries for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Residents #18 and #10) for falls. 1. Resident #18 fell two times and the facility failed to either put an intervention in place or put an inadequate intervention in place to prevent future falls. After Resident #18 fell on [DATE], the facility requested a urinalysis on 7/12/23. The facility collected and received the results on 7/14/23 that revealed a urinary tract infection. The provider ordered to wait for the culture and sensitivity (C&S) results then update them with the results. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jul 20, 2022

    Based on observations, clinical record reviews, photos, staff interviews, community transmission rates, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices during a clinical isolation period from 4/28/22 to present 7/20/22. The facility's anticipated to end their outbreak status as of 8/2/22. The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include: According to the Testing/PPE (personal protective equipment) Requirements Based on Community Transmission Rates form dated 4/19/22 if the community transmission rate is high and substantial the facility staff are required to follow the following guidelines for PPE: a. Residents with suspected or confirmed [CONDITION(S)]-COV-2 (COVID) infection - gown, gloves, eye protection and N95 masks. b. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Dec 31, 2025

    Based on observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions to reduce the risk of contamination and food borne illness. The facility identified a census of 43 residents. Findings include: On 12/30/25 at 10:52 AM, observed the Dietary Manager puree a grilled turkey [NAME] sandwich while wearing gloves. When finished with pureeing the sandwich, the Dietary Manager removed her gloves and then proceeded to wash out the dishes used to puree the sandwich in the sink, put the dirty dishes in the dishwasher and then continued to puree the next food items without washing her hands. On 12/30/25 at 11:30 AM, observation revealed the Dietary Manager wore gloves to get the room trays ready to be delivered to the unit. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jan 15, 2025

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility reported a census of 42. Findings include: A direct observation on 01/12/2025 at 10:23 AM of the kitchen revealed an open container of cottage cheese with a discard date of 01/11/2025. It also revealed an unmarked, undated meat product stored in the freezer in a single sheet of plastic cling wrap. The Dietary Manager identified the item as roast beef, and stated it had been prepared within a day or two of the observation. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF658Nov 13, 2023

    Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide care and services according to accepted standards of clinical practice for 4 out of 14 residents reviewed (Resident #29, #18, #30, #37). The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Findings includes: 1. Resident #29's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMs) score of 7, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS identified Resident #29 required substantial/maximal assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use. Resident #29's MDS included diagnoses of anemia, heart failure, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, non-alzheimer's dementia, anxiety disorder and post traumatic stress disorder. […]

Read 27 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 27 of 100 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 4, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 31, 2025Standard5 findings
  • Jan 15, 2025Standard4 findings
  • Sep 11, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 11, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 13, 2023Standard and complaint10 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 10, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 27, 2022Standard and complaint1 finding
Show the 20 earlier surveys
  • Jul 20, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • May 26, 2021Standard3 findings
  • Jan 12, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 1, 2019Standard8 findings
  • Nov 15, 2018Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
  • Oct 4, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 26, 2018Standard5 findings
  • Feb 16, 2017Standard3 findings
  • Dec 30, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Sep 14, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 14, 2016Complaint4 findings
  • Feb 18, 2016Standard7 findings
  • Sep 1, 2015Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 27, 2015Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 5, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Oct 7, 2014Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Dec 3, 2013—5 findings
  • Sep 20, 2012—9 findings
  • Aug 18, 2011—9 findings
  • Jul 28, 2011—2 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction