Wayland Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Keysville, Virginia · CCN 495226
16 surveys since 2011, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 157
- Surveys
- 16
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 90
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- PRINCIPLE LONG TERM CARE
- County
- Charlotte · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1990
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 39 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Virginia.
Last survey on record
Apr 16, 2025
572 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.16 | 3.42 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.63 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 29.7% | 47.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G12.6% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2873.7% | E718.4% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B12.6% | C12.6% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6222×
Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6572×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
- F6952×
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
- F7002×
Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Wayland Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Mar 12, 2021
Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review it was determined that the facility failed to protect one of 35 residents in the survey sample from resident-to-resident abuse. On 2/28/21, Resident #37 and Resident #4 argued in their room which escalated to Resident #37 pushing his wheelchair into Resident #4's table causing a laceration to Resident #4's right lower leg that required treatment in a local emergency room and closure with 9 staples, resulting in harm. The findings include: Resident #4 was admitted to the facility with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Apr 16, 2025
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, facility staff failed to prepare store and serve food in a sanitary manner in one of one facility kitchens. The findings include: On 04/14/2025 at approximately 11:30 a.m., an observation of the facility's kitchen revealed the following: On 04/14/2025 at approximately 11:25 a.m., an observation of the facility's kitchen revealed a 26-inch fan sitting on a cart blowing into the kitchen and onto a metal shelving unit with four shelves. Observations of the shelves revealed, the top shelf contained 25 clean meal tray covers, the second from the top shelf contained 12 clean tray bottoms, the third from the top shelf contained 30 clean eight-ounce bowls and the bottom shelf contained three racks of clean cups and glasses. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF865Apr 16, 2025
Based on staff interview and facility document review it was determined that the facility staff failed to evidence a continuous Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that monitored its performance and ensured that improvements were sustained, which had the ability to affect all residents within the facility for nine of ten quarters reviewed. The findings included: The facility staff failed to evidence QAPI sign-in sheets for meetings held between Q4 of 2022 and Q4 of 2024. On 4/14/25 at 11:28 a.m., during entrance conference a request was made to ASM (administrative staff member) #1, the administrator for QAPI meeting attendance records from 7/28/22 to the present. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689Jul 28, 2022
Based on staff interview, resident interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide adequate wanderguard monitoring for one of 29 residents, Residents #22; and failed to ensure safety protocols were in place per facility policy for 3 of 3 residents smoking, Residents #36, #38, and #5. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to check the placement of (R22's) wanderguard according to the physician's orders (R22) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: dementia (1). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF700Jul 28, 2022
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement bed rail requirements for 4 of 29 residents in the survey sample, Residents #21, #149, #13 and #22. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to attempt alternatives prior to the use of Resident #21's (R21) bed rails, failed to assess R21 for the risk of entrapment from bed rails, failed to educate R21 or the resident's representative (RR) on the risks and benefits of bed rails and failed to obtain informed consent for the use of bed rails. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 157 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 16, 2025Standard and complaint13 findings
- Jul 28, 2022Standard12 findings
- Jun 23, 2022Complaint11 findings
- Mar 12, 2021Standard13 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 24, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Jun 7, 2019Standard15 findings
- Sep 12, 2018Complaint3 findings
- Mar 9, 2018Standard21 findings
Show the 8 earlier surveys
- Feb 9, 2017Standard and complaint18 findings
- Mar 3, 2016Standard and complaint15 findings
- Mar 12, 2015Standard and complaint11 findings
- Jun 4, 2014Complaint2 findings
- Mar 21, 2014Standard and complaint5 findings
- Mar 28, 2013—5 findings
- Apr 20, 2012—8 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 8, 2011—4 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction