Deficiency Index

Waters Edge at Port Jefferson for Rehabilitation a

Port Jefferson, New York · CCN 335410

21 surveys since 2011, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
79
Surveys
21
Harm or worse
6
Immediate jeopardy
4
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy4

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file16/21

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
120
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
CARERITE CENTERS
County
Suffolk
Medicare-certified since
1974

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
1
Staffing
1
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 79 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in New York.

Last survey on record

Aug 11, 2025

455 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day2.953.37
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.48—
Annual nurse turnover55.6%47.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$153,911 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ14.3%K14.3%L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1147.8%E939.1%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B14.3%C—
CMS’s current file: 23 of the 79 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5802×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F6582×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F6842×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6862×

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

  • F5581×

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Waters Edge at Port Jefferson for Rehabilitation a, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF695Aug 11, 2025

    Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, during the Recertification Survey initiated on 07/21/2025 and completed on 08/11/2025, the facility failed to ensure that a resident requiring respiratory care is provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences. This was identified for two (2) (Resident #74 and Resident #119) of four (4) residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. Specifically, Resident #74 with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease had a physician's order for supplemental oxygen and did not receive it. On 07/25/2025, the resident was in respiratory distress and was utilizing accessory muscles, appeared pale with gray lips, and verbalized I need air. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684Feb 21, 2025

    Based on interviews and closed record reviews , during an abbreviated survey (NY00370917), the facility failed to ensure that each resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (1) out of three (3) residents. Specifically, on [DATE] at 8:01 PM, Resident #2 was evaluated for symptoms including fever and tachycardia. Nurse Practitioner #1 was notified on [DATE] at 6:30 PM of critical lab values and ordered to send Resident #2 to the hospital for an emergent blood transfusion. Registered Nurse Supervisor #1 documented Resident #2 would be sent to the hospital in the morning. Subsequently, on [DATE] at 1:20 AM, Resident #2 was found to be unresponsive, pulseless, and without respirations. Resident #2 expired at 2:01 AM. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Aug 11, 2025

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey, initiated on 07/21/2025 and completed on 08/11/2025, the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was identified during the Kitchen Task observation. Specifically, 1) the walk-in freezer, the storage shelf in the kitchen, and the two-door reach-in freezer had one opened and undated food or food packages. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF835Aug 11, 2025

    Based on record review and staff interviews, during the re-certification survey initiated on 07/21/2025 and completed on 08/11/2025, the facility did not ensure it was administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This was identified for two (2) (Resident #74 and Resident #119) of (4) four residents reviewed for Respiratory care. Specifically, the facility was not effectively administered to ensure two (2) (Resident #74 and Resident #119) of (4) four residents were monitored for respiratory care. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689Feb 21, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00370917), the facility did not provide person-centered care and services necessary to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for three of six residents (Resident #2 #3 #5) reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, (1) Resident #2 was identified as high risk for aspiration (choking) and was to be fed via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube (a feeding tube that allows nutrition directly through your stomach.) Resident #2 physician orders documented medications to be administered by mouth. (2) Resident #3 was evaluated by speech and deemed to be at risk for aspiration, a physician's order indicated a puree diet. […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 79 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 11, 2025Standard9 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 21, 2025Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 22, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 15, 2024Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Jun 14, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 8, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 28, 2022Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Nov 29, 2021Infection control1 finding
Show the 13 earlier surveys
  • Jan 26, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Aug 23, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Oct 16, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 27, 2018Standard5 findings
  • Jan 23, 2017Standard5 findings
  • Feb 2, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Jan 21, 2015Standard7 findings
  • Jan 13, 2014—4 findings
  • Jul 9, 2013Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 8, 2013—6 findings
  • Jun 27, 2012—7 findings · 2 harm
  • May 23, 2012—2 findings
  • Jun 2, 2011—8 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction