Deficiency Index

Briarcliff Manor Center For Rehab And Nursing Care

Briarcliff Manor, New York · CCN 335005

21 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
103
Surveys
21
Harm or worse
6
Immediate jeopardy
5
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy5

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file13/21

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
120
Ownership
For profit - Partnership
Chain
EXCELSIOR CARE GROUP
County
Westchester
Medicare-certified since
1967

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
1
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 79 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in New York.

Last survey on record

Jul 24, 2026

108 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.233.37
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.56—
Annual nurse turnover55.6%47.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$97,282 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ12.9%K—L—
Actual harmG12.9%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2468.6%E720.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B25.7%C—
CMS’s current file: 35 of the 103 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5503×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F6772×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • F7252×

    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Briarcliff Manor Center For Rehab And Nursing Care, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF760Sep 29, 2023

    Based on interviews, and record review during an abbreviated survey (NY00324542), the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of significant medication errors for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for anti-seizure medications. Specifically, Resident #1 had a physician's order for Vimpat (controlled antiseizure medication) 200 milligrams (mg) 1 tab every 12 hours at 9AM and 9PM daily, and over three days in 08/2023 and four days in 09/2023. A total of 12 doses of Vimpat were not administered to Resident #1. Resident #2 had a physician's order for Keppra (anti-seizure medication) 1000 mg 1 tab every 12 hours at 9AM and 9PM daily, and over six dates a total of 7 doses of Keppra were not administered to Resident #2. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Jun 20, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the abbreviated survey (NY00383393), the facility did not ensure a resident remained free from physical abuse. This was evident for one (1) (Resident #1) of four (4) total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #1 reported they were hit in their groin by Certified Nurse Aide #3 on 6/11/2025 at approximately 1:30 AM. This resulted in psychosocial harm that did not rise to level of Immediate Jeopardy. The findings are: The facility policy titled Abuse Prevention & Reporting, dated 1/3/2025, documented any employee involved in abuse will be disciplined appropriately. Resident #1 had diagnoses of hydrocephalus (fluid on the brain) and major depressive disorder. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689Aug 10, 2026

    Based on record review and interviews conducted during the survey, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision/assistance to prevent accidents for two (2) of seven (7) residents (Residents #1 and #12) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, 1) Resident #1 required 2-person assistance with bed mobility and toileting, however the facility did not provide 2-person assistance per the care plan and Resident #1 alleged they were turned roughly and pushed against the side rail of their bed, and 2) Resident #12 required 2-person assistance with showers however the facility did not provide 2-person assistance per the care plan and Resident #12 alleged their head jerked backwards when the head of the shower bed slipped from the certified nurse aide's hands. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF725Feb 2, 2024

    Based on observation, interviews and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated survey (00325156) from 1/28/24 to 2/2/24, the facility did not ensure that sufficient nursing staff was consistently provided to meet the needs of residents on all shifts. Specifically, 1) multiple residents reported during confidential interviews and the group meeting (Resident Council) a of lack of staff to respond to call bells and provide assistance with activities of daily living; 2) multiple nursing staff members reported a lack of sufficient staffing; and 3) analysis of the actual staffing schedule showed that on multiple occasions during the month of January 2024, the facility was below the minimum levels documented on the Facility Assessment. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Feb 2, 2024

    Based on observations and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 1/28/24-2/2/24, the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the metal shelves in a deep freezer that stores food was peeling, there was unlabeled and undated roast beef in a large metal pan located in the walk in refrigerator, there was 20 pounds of undated ground beef in the walk in freezer, the metal shelves in the reach in refrigerator had brownish crusty peelings where desserts, juices, and sandwiches were stored, a metal container in the reach in refrigerator containing mixed fruit was not completely covered, the cook on the tray line was not wearing a beard covering, one food… […]

Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 103 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 10, 2026Complaint7 findings
  • Jul 24, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 20, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 12, 2025Standard and complaint12 findings
  • Jan 17, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 19, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 2, 2024Standard and complaint10 findings
  • Sep 29, 2023Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
Show the 13 earlier surveys
  • May 30, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 27, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 10, 2020Standard6 findings
  • Mar 8, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Aug 2, 2017Standard6 findings
  • Oct 24, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Feb 1, 2016Standard9 findings
  • Aug 6, 2015Complaint4 findings · 4 harm
  • Dec 12, 2014Standard3 findings
  • Dec 20, 2013—2 findings
  • Apr 5, 2013—10 findings
  • Apr 6, 2012—9 findings
  • Jul 5, 2011—9 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction