Village Care Center Inc
Maryville, Missouri · CCN 265643
20 surveys since 2010, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 121
- Surveys
- 20
- Harm or worse
- 6
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 46
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- OSBYCORP
- County
- Nodaway · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1996
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 82 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Missouri.
Last survey on record
Jun 2, 2026
160 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.34 | 3.20 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.68 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 47.1% | 57.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $12,735 across 1 penalty
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G13.4% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D827.6% | E1862.1% | F26.9% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6582×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F6772×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F6952×
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Village Care Center Inc, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Mar 23, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one resident's right to be free from mental and physical abuse when during care, as three staff were providing cares, RN A forcefully pushed the residents wheelchair forward and pulled it back and told the resident something to the effect of Ride'em cowgirl, verbally threatened to shame/humiliate the resident publicly for his/her behavior of taking off his/her clothes in public, when the resident resisted cares and made a biting motion, RN A told the resident babies bite. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Apr 8, 2026
Based on interviews and facility job description review, the facility failed to employ either a full time Registered Dietitian (RD) or a qualified Dietary Manager (DM) to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services. This failure had the potential to affect 29 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 29.Review of the facility job description, Dietary Manager, (DM) undated, showed:- Position reports to the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON).- Dietary Manager (DM) is responsible for the overall operation of the dietary department, ensuring the provision of safe, nutritious, and appealing meals in accordance with physician orders, resident preferences, and regulatory requirements. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Mar 28, 2025
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manager (DM) had the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutritional services. The facility census was 35. 1. The facility did not provide a policy for the Dietary Manager qualifications. During an interview on 3/27/25 at 9:42 A.M., Dietary Manager said: -He/She has worked at the facility for ten years; -He/She has been the Dietary Manager for a year; -He/She did not have any dietary manager certifications; -He/She did not know what certifications were required for a dietary manager; -He/She was not currently enrolled in classes for dietary manager certifications; -He/She needed to make a plan with the dietician about enrolling in dietary certification classes. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 28, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when staff failed to keep a record of the dishwasher temperature and chemical tests, failed to cease using dishwasher when temperatures did not meet requirements, failed to keep a daily record of refrigerator temperatures, failed to wash hands in between tasks and in between glove changes, failed to label and date all foods upon receiving and upon opening, failed to ensure kitchen was clean and in good repair, and failed to ensure dishwasher temperature reached minimum temperatures. The facility census was 35. 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF695Apr 8, 2026
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to provided proper respiratory care when staff failed to date the oxygen tubing when replaced for one of the 12 sampled residents, (Resident #26), failed to change and date oxygen tubing for Resident #29 and failed to change and date nebulizer tubing for Resident #5 and #29, and additionally, when staff failed to properly clean oxygen concentrator filters for two residents (Resident #16 and #29), The facility census was 29. […]
Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 121 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 2, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Apr 8, 2026Standard5 findings
- Mar 23, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Mar 28, 2025Standard11 findings
- Apr 25, 2024Standard3 findings
- Mar 11, 2022Standard13 findings
- Mar 27, 2019Standard10 findings
- Apr 14, 2017Standard15 findings
Show the 12 earlier surveys
- May 26, 2016Standard7 findings
- May 12, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Jul 3, 2015Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 16, 2015Standard13 findings
- Oct 2, 2014Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Mar 26, 2014Standard1 finding
- Mar 14, 2013Standard and complaint8 findings · 2 harm
- Aug 8, 2012—1 finding
- Jun 13, 2012—2 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 20, 2012Standard16 findings
- Apr 4, 2011—9 findings
- Nov 8, 2010—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction