Sunterra Springs Dardenne Prairie
Dardenne Prairie, Missouri · CCN 265881
13 surveys since 2022, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 40
- Surveys
- 13
- Harm or worse
- 5
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 38
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- SUNTERRA SPRINGS
- County
- St. Charles
- Medicare-certified since
- 2020
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 82 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Missouri.
Last survey on record
May 20, 2026
173 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.46 | 3.20 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.10 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 76.1% | 57.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $49,722 across 2 penalties
- Payment denials
- 1
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G39.7% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1858.1% | E825.8% | F26.5% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6584×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5612×
Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
- F5802×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F6772×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Sunterra Springs Dardenne Prairie, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jul 17, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of one resident (Resident #1), of seven sampled residents. While assisting the resident to transfer from the toilet to his/her new motorized chair, staff ran the motorized chair over the resident's left foot. The resident sustained a fractured toe. The facility census was 66. Review of the facility policy for Accidents and Supervision dated 07/2024 showed the following:-The resident environment will remain as free of accident hazards as is possible. Each resident will receive adequate supervision and assistive devises to prevent accidents. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Mar 19, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete weekly skin assessments per facility policy for two residents, (Resident #1 and #2), of five sampled residents. Resident #1 admitted to the facility with no pressure ulcers (a localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Staff failed to identify any issue with the resident's skin before the resident presented with a Stage III pressure ulcer on the resident's buttocks on 1/19/25 (Full thickness skin loss involving damage to, or necrosis of, subcutaneous tissue that may extend down to, but not through, underlying fascia. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Sep 30, 2024
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of one resident (Resident #1), of four sampled residents, who was dependent upon staff for transfers and at risk for falls. The facility failed to ensure staff followed facility policy for using a sit to stand lift. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A transferred Resident #1 using the sit to stand lift without assistance of an additional staff to transfer the resident. The resident sustained significant pain and bruising from the improper transfer. The facility census was 36. The administrator was notified on 9/30/24 at 3:00 P.M , of the Past Non-Compliance which occurred on 9/24/24. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Jun 14, 2023
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1) in a review of three sampled residents, was free from abuse when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A picked the resident up out of bed with his/her arms and aggressively transferred the resident from the wheelchair to the toilet, causing the resident to hit his/her back and head. The resident reported pain at the time and continued pain after the incident. The resident reported feeling helpless and was afraid of CNA A. The facility census was 29. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Apr 12, 2022
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide treatment and monitoring to promote healing for one resident with pressure ulcers and wounds (Resident #5). Resident #5 was admitted to the facility with a Stage III pressure ulcer on 1/27/21. The facility did not obtain or provide treatment to the pressure ulcer until 2/4/21. The wound deteriorated. The resident was hospitalized on [DATE] with deep tissue, unstageable, wounds to the right heel, right buttocks, right lateral foot, right leg and thigh, left mid spine, and left ankle. The resident also had unstageable wounds to the right ankle. These wounds were not identified or treated by the facility. A sample of five residents and six closed records were selected for review. The facility census was 16. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 40 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 20, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jan 15, 2026Standard3 findings
- Nov 5, 2025Complaint3 findings
- Jul 17, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jun 13, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Mar 19, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 5, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Sep 30, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
Show the 5 earlier surveys
- Jan 31, 2024Complaint3 findings
- Nov 30, 2023Standard18 findings
- Jun 14, 2023Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 22, 2022Complaint2 findings
- Apr 12, 2022Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction