Carroll House
Carrollton, Missouri · CCN 265706
14 surveys since 2011, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 56
- Surveys
- 14
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 63
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- JAMES & JUDY LINCOLN
- County
- Carroll · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 2000
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 82 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Missouri.
Last survey on record
Jul 14, 2025
483 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 2.44 | 3.20 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.19 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 45.2% | 57.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $84,890 across 1 penalty
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J13.8% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D519.2% | E1869.2% | F27.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F5782×
Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F5591×
Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
- F5821×
Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Carroll House, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Jul 14, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect two resident's (Resident #18 and Resident #7) right to be free from physical abuse. On 6/15/25 LPN A followed Resident #18 into an unoccupied resident room rolled him/her out of the bed onto the floor multiple times and LPN A walked the resident backwards which resulted in the resident falling and sustaining a fracture of the right tibial plateau (a break in the top portion of the shinbone near the knee joint, that often occurs due to high-energy impacts such as falls). The resident was sent to the local hospital and transferred to another hospital for surgical evaluation. In addition, staff failed to protect Resident #7's right to be free from abuse when Resident #27 hit him/her on the back of the head. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF550Jul 14, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect the rights of a resident's ability to make confidential phone calls to the state abuse and neglect hotline for three of the three sampled residents, Residents #16, #109, and #18, when the facility's provided phones would not allow any outgoing call to dial the Missouri abuse and neglect hotline number. This had the potential to impact all residents of the facility who wished to make a phone call to the Missouri abuse and neglect hotline. The facility census was 56. Review of the facility's policy titled, Residents Rights, undated, showed:-Residents have the right to exercise their rights. Encouragement and assistance is provided for the exercise of the resident's right as a resident and as a citizen. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 30, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff stored food in a sanitary manner and failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary manner when floors, and vents were covered in dirt and debris, and when equipment in the kitchen was covered in dust and when the dry storage contained outdated food and hazardous chemicals and when the facilty failed to ensure the dishwasher sanitizer was checked before meal service. This could potentially impact all residents by dirt or debris coming in contact with food and food preparation areas and food being served on contaminated dishes. Additionally outdated food can be potentially hazardous due to spoilage. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550May 30, 2024
Based on observation interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a dignified existence for three residents (Resident #2, #11 and #24) when the facility allowed multiple residents to remain in common areas with bare skin exposed with no staff intervention. This affected 3 out of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 53. Review of the facility's undated Resident Rights Policy showed in part: -The resident shall be treated with consideration and respect and full recognition of their dignity and individuality. 1. Observation on 5/27/24 at 12:22 P.M. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF559May 30, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow their policy when the facility did not provide four residents a written notice regarding a room change, including the reason for the room change, before the facility moved the resident to another room (Resident # 3, Resident #2, Resident #11 and Resident #24), of the 14 sampled residents . These residents did not want to be moved and were emotionally upset about the room changes. The facility's census was 53. Review of the facility policy, Room Change, dated 2017 showed: -It is the policy of this facility to promote a resident's right to make choices and to promptly receive written notice of a room change or change in an assigned roommate. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 56 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 14, 2025Standard and complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- May 30, 2024Standard and complaint11 findings
- Dec 26, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Oct 28, 2022Standard12 findings
- Dec 18, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Sep 19, 2019Standard1 finding
- Jul 20, 2018Standard2 findings
- Aug 9, 2017Standard4 findings
Show the 6 earlier surveys
- Oct 12, 2016Standard4 findings
- Oct 1, 2015Standard and complaint6 findings
- Nov 13, 2014Standard2 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 11, 2013—3 findings
- Nov 14, 2012—1 finding
- Oct 6, 2011—5 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction