Villa Valencia Healthcare Center
Laguna Hills, California · CCN 555462
42 surveys since 2011, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 191
- Surveys
- 42
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 59
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- ASPEN SKILLED HEALTHCARE
- County
- Orange
- Medicare-certified since
- 1991
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 252 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in California.
Last survey on record
Jan 21, 2026
292 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.47 | 4.36 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.21 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 45.3% | 36.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2661.9% | E37.1% | F24.8% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B1126.2% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6844×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F8424×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5582×
Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Villa Valencia Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Nov 10, 2022
Based on interview and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure a qualified individual was responsible to oversee the day-to-day food service operations when: * The food service supervisor did not possess the qualifications necessary to oversee the day-to-day food service operations, and * The RD did not provide oversight of the food service operations. These failures had the potential for risk of food borne illness and compromising nutritional status in all 48 residents that received food prepared in the kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility's CMS 672 Resident Census and Conditions of residents completed by the facility dated 11/9/22, showed 48 of 48 residents in the facility received food prepared in the kitchen. 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Nov 10, 2022
Based on observation, interview, facility P&P, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the food safety and sanitation requirements were met in the kitchen as evidenced by the following: * The facility failed to ensure the mechanically altered chicken prepared for the lunch meal service was served with an internal food temperature of equal to or more than 165 degrees Fahrenheit . * The facility failed to ensure the TCS (time/temperature control for safety foods - foods that require time and temperature controls to limit the growth of illness causing bacteria) were not cooled properly. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen staff wore gloves when handling the residents' food. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF803Aug 7, 2026
Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure dietary services were followed. * The diet order was not followed for Resident 66, who was on a fortified diet. * The facility failed to ensure the meal trays for Residents 2, 25, 29, 32, 46, 56, and 78 were checked before serving it to the residents by CNA 1. These failures posed the risk of the residents not receiving the appropriate diet. Findings: The facility was equipped with a satellite kitchen. The residents' meals were prepared in the main kitchen. Review of the facility's Diet Type Report for August 2026 showed a total of 48 of 53 residents received meals prepared by the main kitchen. 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Aug 7, 2026
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure a container of Sanicloth wipes was not stored next to boxes of Glucerna and Ensure nutritional supplements used for residents. Additionally, an unlabeled and undated sandwich was stored with boxes of cereal, and there were crumbs in the lower area of stove of an oven. * The facility failed to ensure a box was not stored five inches from sprinkler inside cooler fridge. Additionally, a box of unlabeled frozen tacos was stored inside the cooler fridge. There was a warped pot with an uneven surface and 14 salad plates were not dated and labeled in a meal cart inside cooler fridge. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812May 16, 2025
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the food safety and sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen as evidenced by: * The facility failed to ensure the proper hand hygiene was followed during the food preparation. * The facility failed to ensure proper labeling and dating of food in the refrigerator. * The facility failed to ensure the hair restraints were worn by staff in the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen equipment was maintained in a sanitary condition. * The facility failed to ensure the food item in the walk-in freezer was dated and labeled. * The facility failed to ensure the ice cream freezer was in sanitary condition. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 191 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 7, 2026Standard15 findings
- Jan 21, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Oct 10, 2025Complaint5 findings
- May 16, 2025Standard14 findings
- Apr 2, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Feb 20, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jan 27, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Sep 5, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 34 earlier surveys
- Jul 24, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jun 13, 2024Standard2 findings
- Feb 21, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Oct 4, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Aug 24, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jun 12, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Nov 10, 2022Standard11 findings
- Nov 19, 2021Complaint3 findings
- Aug 17, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Aug 19, 2019Standard7 findings
- Aug 10, 2018Standard12 findings
- Feb 15, 2018Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 16, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Jul 27, 2017Standard14 findings
- Aug 12, 2016Standard8 findings
- Jul 13, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Jun 10, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Apr 19, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Aug 12, 2015Standard11 findings
- Jun 4, 2015Complaint1 finding
- May 5, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Mar 30, 2015Complaint4 findings
- Jan 23, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Aug 1, 2014Standard13 findings
- May 27, 2014Complaint2 findings
- Apr 1, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Jan 30, 2014—4 findings
- Jul 3, 2013—9 findings
- Apr 23, 2013—1 finding
- Mar 20, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
- Oct 1, 2012—1 finding
- Aug 9, 2012—17 findings
- Jul 12, 2012—2 findings
- Sep 28, 2011—11 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction