Deficiency Index

Vibra Hospital of Northern California D/P SNF

Redding, California · CCN 555588

35 surveys since 2012, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
137
Surveys
35
Harm or worse
6
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2012–2025
’12’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file30/35

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
32
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
VIBRA HEALTHCARE
County
Shasta
Medicare-certified since
1994

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 252 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in California.

Last survey on record

May 23, 2025

535 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day6.094.36
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.47—

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1350.0%E726.9%F623.1%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 26 of the 137 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F6102×

    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

  • F8012×

    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.

  • F8022×

    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.

  • F8062×

    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Vibra Hospital of Northern California D/P SNF, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 23, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food safety and sanitation guidelines were followed when: 1. Time/Temperature Control for Safey (TCS) food, (food that requires specific temperature management to prevent harmful bacteria growth and toxin formation), for residents was not stored at appropriate temperatures in one of one nourishment refrigerators; and 2. The dish machine wash and rinse cycle temperatures did not meet manufacturer's temperature specifications; and 3. Black matter was found on the underside of the top surface of the ice machine storage bin located in the facility kitchen; and 4. A butcher block wooden cutting board was not cleaned with soap and water before being sanitized; and 5. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 7, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Food and Nutritional Services staff followed food safety and sanitation guidelines when: 1. Meat was not thawed properly. 2. Hand hygiene was not consistently performed. 3. The dish machine water temperature did not meet the manufacturer specified guidelines. 4. One hand washing sink in the food service area, did not have hot water. 5. Two of three ice machines were not clean. 6. The sanitizing storage process used for wiping cloths was not followed. 7. Hair restraints were not consistently used by kitchen and maintenance staff. 8. Food preparation equipment was not in good working order. 9. Food was stored in a used non-approved storage container. 10. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF908Mar 7, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain essential foodservice equipment in safe operating condition when: 1. The dish machine water temperature did not meet the manufacturer specified guidelines. 2. One hand washing sink in the food service area did not have hot water. 3. One of three ice machine storage bins was not cleaned per manufacturer specification. These failures had the potential to increase the risk of food and ice contamination, and subject the residents who ate food or used ice from the facility's kichen, to food borne illnesses such as stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. Findings: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Feb 17, 2023

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate oversight of the Food and Nutrition Services by qualified personnel when: 1. The Registered Dietitian (RD) did not work full time in the Food and Nutrition Services kitchen, and the Dietary Manager (DM) did not meet qualifications for a director of food and nutrition services. 2. There was not an effective system in place to ensure effective staff training and competency in critical elements of food safety, and staff work practice deficiencies were not identified or corrected by the Registered Dietitian providing oversight to the kitchen, or by the Dietary Manager. These failures had the potential to result in foodborne illness and a decline in medical status for all residents living in the facility. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Feb 17, 2023

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation when: 1. Kitchen equipment was not clean. 2. Staff did not utilize proper hand hygiene and glove use to prevent cross food contamination. 3. Potentially hazardous foods were not cooled according to professional standards of practice for food safety. 4. Staff did not ensure that vegetables were properly prepared with food wash according to the manufacturer's recommendations. 5. […]

Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 137 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 23, 2025Standard8 findings
  • Feb 5, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 14, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 7, 2024Standard and complaint6 findings
  • May 10, 2023Complaint3 findings
  • Feb 17, 2023Standard and complaint10 findings
  • Sep 1, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 15, 2021Complaint3 findings
Show the 27 earlier surveys
  • Jul 7, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • May 24, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 21, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 12, 2019Standard9 findings
  • Feb 12, 2019Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 18, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 21, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 12, 2018Standard11 findings
  • Mar 19, 2018Complaint4 findings
  • Jul 20, 2017Standard6 findings
  • Jun 30, 2016Standard12 findings
  • Dec 30, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 1, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • May 22, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • May 7, 2015Standard10 findings
  • Jan 28, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • May 16, 2014Standard3 findings
  • Dec 6, 2013—6 findings
  • Nov 18, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Sep 4, 2013—2 findings
  • Jul 18, 2013—8 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 17, 2013—1 finding
  • Feb 14, 2013—6 findings
  • Dec 28, 2012—1 finding
  • Apr 20, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 10, 2012—1 finding
  • Feb 21, 2012—9 findings · 2 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction