Valley View Care Center
Canon City, Colorado · CCN 065347
19 surveys since 2011, 7 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 141
- Surveys
- 19
- Harm or worse
- 7
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 60
- Ownership
- For profit - Partnership
- Chain
- VIVAGE SENIOR LIVING
- County
- Fremont · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1996
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 42 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Colorado.
Last survey on record
Sep 11, 2025
424 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.15 | 3.60 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.62 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 38.8% | 46.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $8,281 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J12.4% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G12.4% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2047.6% | E1535.7% | F511.9% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6005×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F5842×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
- F6442×
Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
- F6772×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Valley View Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Feb 26, 2025
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#3) of three residents at risk for elopement out of 17 sample residents received adequate supervision and were kept free from elopement. Specifically, the facility failed to provide Resident #3 with the supervision necessary to prevent elopement. The facility's failures created a situation for the likelihood of serious harm to residents' health and safety if not immediately corrected. The facility was a totally secure building specializing in serving residents with severe mental illness, dementia and behavioral health issues. The entire campus had a six-foot high security fence around the whole campus with a wired overhang in the unrestricted front resident space to discourage anyone from climbing over the fence. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF692Dec 2, 2021
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the nutritional and hydration needs were consistently met for two residents (#13 and #15) of three out of 26 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent a significant weight loss for Resident #13 who was at nutritional risk due to poor nutritional intake and who required staff assistance for cueing at meals. The facility failed to identify assistance needed with meals in timely manner and address Resident #13's nutritional needs. Lack of timely interventions to aid Resident #13 to maintain her nutritional status led to a significant, unplanned weight loss of 13.4% in four months. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 13, 2026
Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in a sanitary manner in the main kitchen.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Maintain the ice machine in a sanitary condition; and,-Maintain the kitchen in a sanitary condition.Findings include:I. Failure to maintain the ice machine in a sanitary conditionA. Professional referenceThe Colorado Retail Food Establishment Regulations, (3/16/24), retrieved on 8/19/26, read in pertinent part, Equipment food-contact surfaces and utensils shall be clean to sight and touch. (4-601.11) Nonfood-contact surfaces of equipment shall be kept free of an accumulation of dust, dirt, food residue, and other debris. (4-601.11)B. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF838Feb 26, 2025
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources were necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. Specifically, the facility failed to develop a facility assessment that included all resources, education, staff competencies and facility based risk assessments for a facility that was a totally secured locked facility for residents with mental illness and dementia diagnosis. Cross-reference F689: failure to prevent a resident from eloping a secured locked facility. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Facility Assessment policy, dated October 2018, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/26/25 at 5:26 p.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF843Feb 26, 2025
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to have a written transfer agreement with one or more hospitals approved for participation under Medicare and Medicaid programs to reasonably ensure residents would be transferred from the facility to a hospital, and assured of timely admission to the hospital when transfer was medically appropriate. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a written agreement was in effect with one local area hospital. Findings include: I. Record review A request was made to the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/26/25 at 2:10 p.m., for the facility's hospital transfer agreement. -The facility was unable to provide a written agreement for the one area hospital. II. Staff interview The NHA was interviewed on 2/27/25 at 2:53 p.m. […]
Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 141 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 13, 2026Standard6 findings
- Sep 11, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jun 5, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Feb 26, 2025Complaint6 findings · 1 harm
- May 15, 2024Standard and complaint6 findings
- Oct 18, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Sep 6, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jan 24, 2023Standard and complaint20 findings
Show the 11 earlier surveys
- Dec 2, 2021Standard6 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 1, 2020Standard10 findings
- Mar 12, 2019Standard5 findings
- Sep 6, 2017Standard9 findings
- Jul 12, 2016Standard11 findings
- Jan 19, 2016Complaint1 finding
- May 21, 2015Standard8 findings
- Aug 14, 2014Standard5 findings
- Jul 23, 2013—4 findings
- Jun 26, 2012Standard27 findings · 4 harm
- Apr 5, 2011—13 findings · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction