Glenwood Springs Healthcare
Glenwood Springs, Colorado · CCN 065244
26 surveys since 2011, 18 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 215
- Surveys
- 26
- Harm or worse
- 18
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 54
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- MADISON CREEK PARTNERS
- County
- Garfield · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1988
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 42 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Colorado.
Last survey on record
Apr 21, 2026
202 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Annual nurse turnover | 81.8% | 46.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G26.9% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1137.9% | E1241.4% | F413.8% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F5612×
Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
- F6582×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F6792×
Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
- F6862×
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Glenwood Springs Healthcare, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Jul 31, 2024
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment and services to treat and prevent pressure injuries for one (#1) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers out of 39 sample residents. Resident #1, who was known to be at risk for pressure injuries, was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The resident had diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (disabling disease of brain and spinal cord), neurogenic bladder and metabolic encephalopathy (brain disorder caused by chemical imbalance of the blood). Hospital documentation recommended treatment for the wounds which were present to the Resident #1's sacrum, right lower extremity and left lower extremity upon the resident's readmission to the facility on [DATE]. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Jan 11, 2022
Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#11) of two residents reviewed for pressure injuries, out of 26 sample residents, received care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent and heal pressure injuries. Resident #11 had a facility acquired unstageable pressure injury which was not identified as unavoidable in the medical record. The review of the resident's progress notes and medical record between 11/11/21 and 1/10/22 did not identify the resident was seen by her primary physician or by a wound physician after it was identified the resident had an unstageable pressure injury/DTI (deep tissue injury). […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Aug 6, 2021
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment and protect residents from staff-to-resident abuse involving two (#1 and #2) of four sample residents were free from verbal and physical abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free from abuse by certified nurse aide (CNA) #1. The resident reported she was verbally and physically abused by CNA #1 on 6/11/21. Although CNA #1 was suspended and instructed not to provide care for Resident #1, the resident said she was angry at the time of the incident and fearful of retaliation afterward, and felt the nursing home administrator (NHA) minimized her concerns and failed to [MEDICATION(S)]. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF610Aug 6, 2021
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of verbal and physical abuse involving two (#1 and #2) of four sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Thoroughly investigate the alleged violation; -Prevent further abuse, neglect, exploitation and mistreatment from occurring while the investigation is in progress; and -Take appropriate corrective action, as a result of investigation findings. The failures resulted in incidents of abuse involving incontinence care with certified nurse aides (CNAs). The first incident resulted in an allegation of verbal and physical abuse by CNA #1 towards Resident #1 on 6/11/21. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Mar 11, 2021
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide supervision and assistance to prevent falls with injury for one (#2) of three residents reviewed for falls/accidents out of seven sample residents. The facility failed to observe and supervise, anticipate needs and implement fall prevention measures for Resident #2, who was impulsive, had a history of [REDACTED]. The facility failed to complete accurate fall risk assessments on two occasions. The facility's interdisciplinary team (IDT) failed to determine the actual root cause of why Resident #2 continued to fall. The facility failed to implement new fall interventions following each of the resident's ten falls in the facility between 9/30/2020 and 3/11/21. The resident sustained [REDACTED]. […]
Read 37 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 37 of 215 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 21, 2026Complaint3 findings
- Oct 17, 2024Standard and complaint11 findings
- Jul 31, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Mar 30, 2023Standard10 findings
- Jan 11, 2022Standard6 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 6, 2021Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Mar 11, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 10, 2021Infection control1 finding
Show the 18 earlier surveys
- Oct 27, 2020Standard and complaint15 findings
- Feb 26, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Nov 26, 2019Complaint4 findings
- Apr 17, 2019Standard and complaint16 findings
- Jan 16, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Jan 30, 2018Standard14 findings
- Nov 20, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Nov 21, 2016Standard20 findings · 4 harm
- Dec 15, 2015Standard14 findings
- Sep 30, 2015Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
- Feb 13, 2015Standard22 findings · 5 harm
- Nov 6, 2014Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
- Jul 25, 2014Complaint4 findings
- Mar 27, 2014Standard12 findings
- Jun 20, 2013—11 findings
- May 3, 2012—25 findings
- Aug 24, 2011—2 findings
- Feb 23, 2011—9 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Pine Ridge Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterPagosa Springs4 harm findings
- City Scape Rehabilitation & Care Center LLCDenver6 harm findings
- Center at Centerplace, LLC, TheGreeley4 harm findings
- Medallion Post Acute RehabilitationColorado Springs7 harm findings
- High Plains Post Acute LLCPueblo6 harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction