Yampa Valley Healthcare Center
Craig, Colorado · CCN 065384
22 surveys since 2012, 14 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 117
- Surveys
- 22
- Harm or worse
- 14
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 58
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Moffat · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 2004
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 42 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Colorado.
Last survey on record
May 7, 2026
186 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.39 | 3.60 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.80 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 45.5% | 46.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $120,965 across 3 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K12.5% | L— |
| Actual harm | G922.5% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1025.0% | E1332.5% | F615.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C12.5% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6895×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6924×
Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
- F6003×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6842×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Yampa Valley Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF600Apr 21, 2022
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to protect seven of seven residents (#19, #25, #10 and four residents who asked to remain anonymous) out of 29 sample residents, from resident-to-resident abuse that contributed to the residents experiencing emotional and psychological harm. This deficiency was cited previously during a recertification survey on 3/25/21. Although the facility corrected the deficiency, based on the findings below, the facility has not maintained compliance with this regulatory requirement. Specifically, the facility failed to protect the residents from repeated instances of verbal and mental abuse by Resident #19. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689May 7, 2026
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were kept free from accidents or hazards for one (#3) of two residents out of six sample residents.Resident #3, was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral vascular disease (CVA), and diabetes. Resident #3 was dependent on staff assistance for transfers using a Hoyer lift (mechanical lift). On 10/28/25, the staff were transferring Resident #3 from her bed to the shower chair using the Hoyer lift. The Hoyer lift sling came unhooked from the Hoyer lift during the transfer, which resulted in Resident #3 falling to the floor. The resident hit her head when she fell and was transferred to the hospital for evaluation. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF692Nov 25, 2024
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#26 and #5) of six residents out of 16 sample residents received the care and services necessary to meet their nutrition needs to maintain their highest level of physical well-being. Resident #26 was admitted to the facility for long term care on 1/4/23 with diagnoses of dementia, hypotension (low blood pressure), hypokalemia (low potassium), hypothyroidism (low thyroid function) and depression. Upon admission on 1/4/23, Resident #26 weighed 152 pounds (lbs) and she reported she liked to eat eggs, coffee and sweets. Resident #26 had gradual weight gain until 4/12/24 when she weighed 190 lbs. At this time, the resident started gradually losing weight. On 9/4/24 the resident weighed 182 lbs. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Aug 7, 2024
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were kept free from abuse for three (#1, #2 and #3) of six residents reviewed for abuse out of six sample residents. Resident #1, who had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and a tendency to wander, had a plan of care which documented the resident had impaired safety awareness and wandered aimlessly. The interventions were to offer Resident #1 pleasant diversions, structured activities, food, conversation, television and card games. On 2/28/24 Resident #1 wandered into Resident #2's room. Resident #2 told Resident #1 he was in the wrong room and told him to leave. Resident #1 refused to leave the room which caused Resident #2 to push Resident #1 to the floor. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF692Feb 9, 2024
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#11) of two residents reviewed received the care and services necessary to meet their nutritional needs and maintain their highest physical well-being level out of 25 sample residents. Resident #11 was at nutritional risk with diagnoses of gastroesophageal reflux disease, muscle weakness and dementia. The registered dietitian (RD) implemented measures for the resident's nutrition risk and weight. Observations during the survey revealed the resident was not provided finger foods or fortified foods at meals, a brightly colored plate and alternatives offered when Resident #11's intake was poor. The facility failed to implement nutritional recommendations at mealtimes. […]
Read 30 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 30 of 117 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 7, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 4, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Aug 5, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Nov 25, 2024Standard4 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 7, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 9, 2024Complaint11 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 15, 2023Standard and complaint7 findings · 2 harm
- Oct 6, 2022Complaint2 findings
Show the 14 earlier surveys
- Apr 21, 2022Standard13 findings · 4 harm
- Mar 25, 2021Standard and complaint9 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 7, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Nov 18, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Aug 5, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Apr 30, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Feb 21, 2019Standard and complaint8 findings
- Jan 18, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Aug 31, 2017Standard8 findings
- Jul 13, 2016Standard10 findings
- Sep 1, 2015Standard7 findings
- Jul 3, 2014Standard10 findings · 3 harm
- Sep 19, 2013—9 findings
- Nov 1, 2012—8 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction