Deficiency Index

Yampa Valley Healthcare Center

Craig, Colorado · CCN 065384

22 surveys since 2012, 14 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
117
Surveys
22
Harm or worse
14
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2012–2026
’12’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file14/22

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
58
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Moffat · rural
Medicare-certified since
2004

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
4
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 42 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Colorado.

Last survey on record

May 7, 2026

186 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.393.60
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.80—
Annual nurse turnover45.5%46.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$120,965 across 3 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K12.5%L—
Actual harmG922.5%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1025.0%E1332.5%F615.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C12.5%
CMS’s current file: 40 of the 117 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6895×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F6924×

    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.

  • F6003×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6842×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Yampa Valley Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF600Apr 21, 2022

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to protect seven of seven residents (#19, #25, #10 and four residents who asked to remain anonymous) out of 29 sample residents, from resident-to-resident abuse that contributed to the residents experiencing emotional and psychological harm. This deficiency was cited previously during a recertification survey on 3/25/21. Although the facility corrected the deficiency, based on the findings below, the facility has not maintained compliance with this regulatory requirement. Specifically, the facility failed to protect the residents from repeated instances of verbal and mental abuse by Resident #19. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689May 7, 2026

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were kept free from accidents or hazards for one (#3) of two residents out of six sample residents.Resident #3, was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral vascular disease (CVA), and diabetes. Resident #3 was dependent on staff assistance for transfers using a Hoyer lift (mechanical lift). On 10/28/25, the staff were transferring Resident #3 from her bed to the shower chair using the Hoyer lift. The Hoyer lift sling came unhooked from the Hoyer lift during the transfer, which resulted in Resident #3 falling to the floor. The resident hit her head when she fell and was transferred to the hospital for evaluation. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF692Nov 25, 2024

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#26 and #5) of six residents out of 16 sample residents received the care and services necessary to meet their nutrition needs to maintain their highest level of physical well-being. Resident #26 was admitted to the facility for long term care on 1/4/23 with diagnoses of dementia, hypotension (low blood pressure), hypokalemia (low potassium), hypothyroidism (low thyroid function) and depression. Upon admission on 1/4/23, Resident #26 weighed 152 pounds (lbs) and she reported she liked to eat eggs, coffee and sweets. Resident #26 had gradual weight gain until 4/12/24 when she weighed 190 lbs. At this time, the resident started gradually losing weight. On 9/4/24 the resident weighed 182 lbs. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Aug 7, 2024

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were kept free from abuse for three (#1, #2 and #3) of six residents reviewed for abuse out of six sample residents. Resident #1, who had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and a tendency to wander, had a plan of care which documented the resident had impaired safety awareness and wandered aimlessly. The interventions were to offer Resident #1 pleasant diversions, structured activities, food, conversation, television and card games. On 2/28/24 Resident #1 wandered into Resident #2's room. Resident #2 told Resident #1 he was in the wrong room and told him to leave. Resident #1 refused to leave the room which caused Resident #2 to push Resident #1 to the floor. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF692Feb 9, 2024

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#11) of two residents reviewed received the care and services necessary to meet their nutritional needs and maintain their highest physical well-being level out of 25 sample residents. Resident #11 was at nutritional risk with diagnoses of gastroesophageal reflux disease, muscle weakness and dementia. The registered dietitian (RD) implemented measures for the resident's nutrition risk and weight. Observations during the survey revealed the resident was not provided finger foods or fortified foods at meals, a brightly colored plate and alternatives offered when Resident #11's intake was poor. The facility failed to implement nutritional recommendations at mealtimes. […]

Read 30 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 30 of 117 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 7, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Dec 4, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 5, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 25, 2024Standard4 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 7, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 9, 2024Complaint11 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 15, 2023Standard and complaint7 findings · 2 harm
  • Oct 6, 2022Complaint2 findings
Show the 14 earlier surveys
  • Apr 21, 2022Standard13 findings · 4 harm
  • Mar 25, 2021Standard and complaint9 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 7, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Nov 18, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Aug 5, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 30, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Feb 21, 2019Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Jan 18, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 31, 2017Standard8 findings
  • Jul 13, 2016Standard10 findings
  • Sep 1, 2015Standard7 findings
  • Jul 3, 2014Standard10 findings · 3 harm
  • Sep 19, 2013—9 findings
  • Nov 1, 2012—8 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction