University City Rehabilitation and Healthcare CTR
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania · CCN 395722
44 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 183
- Surveys
- 44
- Harm or worse
- 4
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 124
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES
- County
- Philadelphia
- Medicare-certified since
- 1986
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 132 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Pennsylvania.
Last survey on record
Jul 29, 2026
103 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.37 | 3.42 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.76 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 57.0% | 47.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D4989.1% | E59.1% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B11.8% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F7615×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
- F6844×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F5543×
Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5842×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at University City Rehabilitation and Healthcare CTR, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF689Jul 7, 2021
Based on observations, review of facility policies, facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that water temperatures in resident bathroom hand sinks were maintained at a safe temperature for two of two nursing units observed (First Floor and Second Floor Nursing Units). This failure placed residents on the First and Second Floor Nursing Units at risk for serious injury from a burn and resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for 52 of 109 residents (Resident R4, R5, R7, R8, R10, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R18, R29, R30, R33, R37, R40, R44, R45, R46, R48, R49, R51, R52, R62, R64, R72, R73, R74, R79, R83, R85, R88, R89, R90, R91, R92, R93, R104, R105, R107, R110, R112, R114, R116, R118, R121, R124, R128, R230, R300, R301, and… […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Apr 24, 2023
Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Resident R1 was properly secured during transfer via the use of a sit-to-stand mechanical device and failed to ensure that the safest mechanical device was utilized during transfer for one of four residents reviewed (Resident R1). This failure resulted in actual harm to Resident R1 who sustained a fracture of the right tibia and fibula. Findings include: Review of undated facility policy Lifting Machine, Using a Mechanical revealed the purpose of this procedure is to establish the general principles of safe lifting using a mechanical lifting device. Mechanical lifts may be used for tasks such as transferring a resident from bed to chair. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF697Jul 7, 2021
Based on review of clinical records, resident interview, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that proper pain management was provided for one of 10 residents reviewed (Resident R67), resulting in harm when the resident suffered severe pain without effective relief. Findings include: A clinical record review revealed that Resident R67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . An annual Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - a comprehensive, standardized assessment of each resident's functional capabilities and health needs) dated 5/7/21, indicated that the diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF756Jul 7, 2021
Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to make certain that the monthly Medication Regimen Reviews (MRR) were conducted for one of two residents (Resident R27). Findings include: The review of the State Operations Manual 483.45(c)(1) indicated that drug regimen of each resident must be reviewed at least once a month by a licensed pharmacist. A clinical record review revealed that Resident R27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included [CONDITION(S)], muscle weakness, pressure ulcers, [CONDITION(S)], and anxiety. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF761Jul 7, 2021
Based on accepted standards of practice, manufacturer guidelines, observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to date opened insulin pens (single resident pen type device for injecting insulin) in two of two medication carts (1st floor back hall and 2nd floor back hall medication carts), and to properly secure medications in the medication cart (2nd floor back hall). Findings include: The United States Pharmacopeia (USP) General Chapter 797 recommends that if a multi-dose has been opened or accessed, the vial should be dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a different (shorter or longer) date for that opened vial. […]
Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 183 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 29, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Mar 23, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Mar 5, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jan 9, 2026Standard and complaint9 findings
- Jun 10, 2025Complaint6 findings
- May 8, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Mar 25, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jan 27, 2025Standard13 findings
Show the 36 earlier surveys
- Dec 9, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Sep 16, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Apr 24, 2024Standard11 findings
- Mar 5, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Feb 9, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Jan 10, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Dec 26, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Aug 9, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jun 16, 2023Standard10 findings
- Apr 24, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Sep 28, 2022Standard14 findings
- Jul 8, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jan 3, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jul 7, 2021Standard19 findings · 2 harm
- Feb 24, 2021Complaint5 findings
- Sep 3, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Jul 14, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Feb 20, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Oct 4, 2019Complaint1 finding
- May 29, 2019Standard23 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 18, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Jun 14, 2018Standard13 findings
- May 9, 2017Standard6 findings
- Jan 31, 2017Complaint2 findings
- May 13, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Apr 21, 2016Standard3 findings
- Feb 3, 2015Standard3 findings
- Dec 3, 2014Complaint1 finding
- May 22, 2014Complaint2 findings
- Mar 18, 2014Standard7 findings
- Nov 13, 2013—1 finding
- Feb 15, 2013—2 findings
- Dec 31, 2012—2 findings
- Mar 6, 2012—2 findings
- Jun 28, 2011—1 finding
- May 3, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction