Deficiency Index

Twin Ports Health Services

Superior, Wisconsin · CCN 525370

13 surveys since 2010, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
61
Surveys
13
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file9/13

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
90
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
NORTH SHORE HEALTHCARE
County
Douglas
Medicare-certified since
1984

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
5
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=10, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jan 22, 2026

291 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.453.71
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.16—
Annual nurse turnover19.2%44.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD880.0%E110.0%F110.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 10 of the 61 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6231×

    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.

  • F6251×

    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.

  • F6561×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6841×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Twin Ports Health Services, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Sep 25, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the safety of food handling in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This had the potential to affect all 78 of 78 residents that eat orally. Food (milk and lettuce) placed in the walk-in cooler had been opened but was not labeled with an opened date, resulting in the potential for foodborne illnesses to spread. Findings include: The facility's policy entitled Food Storage dated 8/16/2022, states in part, .Refrigerated food storage: . f. All foods should be covered. Labeled and dated. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Jan 22, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not establish an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 10 of 79 residents (R) observed for infection control practices.Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) I did not perform proper glove changes and hand hygiene during cares.Staff did not use appropriate infection control practices. No hand hygiene between residents while passing meal trays and the meal trays were placed on dirty Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) container. CNA D served R78 a meal tray and placed it on a contaminated surface. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Jan 22, 2026

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility did not provide wound management or diabetic management by professional standards of practice to maintain a resident's highest practicable level of physical well-being for 1 of 3 residents (R32) reviewed.-Staff did not provide wound care dressing as ordered by physician for R32. -R32's air mattress settings were not appropriate per R32's weight based on offloading measures to minimize skin breakdown. -Staff did not administer short acting insulin to R32 when Blood Glucose (BG) was high.Findings include:Facility policy titled Change in Condition of the Resident, last revised 09/20/22, stated in part, .When a resident presents with a possible change of condition or noted changes in mental or physical functioning: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF686Jan 22, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, facility did not implement professional standards of practice to ensure that a resident does not develop pressure injuries (PIs), receives necessary treatment and services to promote healing and prevent new PIs from developing for 1 of 3 resident (R) reviewed. (R44)R44 was admitted to the facility with stage 3 PIs to left trochanter (hip) and left buttock and stage 2 PIs to the right hip and right buttocks. Facility staff did not complete a comprehensive PI assessment to include measurements and description of R44's PIs on admission. Facility staff on the following assessment documented all the PIs only at a stage 2. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Jul 18, 2025

    Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility did not ensure the resident environment remains free of accident hazards as possible and each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents (R)(R1) reviewed.The facility does not have a policy or procedure in place to assess risk for residents storing and using a personal vehicle on facility premises.R1 eloped from facility using personal vehicle parked on facility premises.This is evidenced by:State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, states in part: The facility must ensure the facility provides an environment that is free from accident hazards over which the facility has control and provides supervision.to each resident to prevent avoidable accidents. […]

Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 61 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 22, 2026Standard3 findings
  • Jul 18, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 25, 2024Standard4 findings
  • Sep 13, 2023Standard2 findings
  • Jun 13, 2019Standard1 finding
  • Apr 5, 2018Standard5 findings
  • Mar 23, 2017Standard4 findings
  • Mar 17, 2016Standard3 findings
Show the 5 earlier surveys
  • Feb 12, 2015Standard12 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 30, 2014Standard12 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 8, 2012—4 findings
  • Jul 13, 2011—2 findings · 1 harm
  • May 20, 2010—8 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction