Deficiency Index

Rennes Health and Rehab Center-Appleton

Appleton, Wisconsin · CCN 525583

16 surveys since 2011, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
39
Surveys
16
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file11/16

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
88
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
RENNES GROUP
County
Outagamie
Medicare-certified since
1995

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
5
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=10, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Aug 6, 2025

460 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.653.71
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.22—
Annual nurse turnover34.0%44.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD6100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 6 of the 39 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5582×

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

  • F5591×

    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.

  • F6561×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6571×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6921×

    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Rennes Health and Rehab Center-Appleton, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Apr 27, 2022

    Based on observation, Resident (R) interviews, and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure residents were provided a hand hygiene opportunity before lunch meal service for 13 residents. This practice had the potential to affect all the residents of the facility. Facility staff did not offer hand hygiene at the point of service for lunch meal to 11 residents in the main dining room and 2 residents provided room trays. Findings include: On 4/25/22 beginning at 11:44 AM, Surveyor began observations in the facility's main dining room. At 11:52 AM, Surveyor observed the first (unidentified) resident arrived in dining room for meal service. No hand hygiene was offered at that time. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF692Aug 6, 2025

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure appropriate care and treatment related to weight monitoring was provided for 1 resident (R) (R86) of 2 sampled residents.The facility did not complete additional assessments and ensure the physician was notified when R86 had a weight gain of more than 2 pounds in 1 day.Findings include:The facility's Heart Failure-Clinical Protocol policy, revised April 2007, indicates: .2.The nurse will assess and document/report the following: a. Vital signs; b. General physical assessment .1. The physician will review and make recommendations for relevant aspects of the nursing care plan; for example, what symptoms to expect, how often and what (weights .) to monitor, when to report findings to the physician, etc. 2. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF558Jan 8, 2025

    Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R2) of 5 sampled residents had a call light within reach. On 1/8/25, R2's call light was wedged between the mattress and side rail of R2's bed and not within R2's reach. Findings include: On 1/8/25, Surveyor reviewed R2's medical record. R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including history of falling, diabetes, hemiplegia (weakness on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (paralysis on one side of the body) following cerebrovascular accident (CVA) affecting the right dominant side, morbid obesity, and anxiety disorder. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF558Jun 6, 2024

    Based on observation, staff and family interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R44) of 18 residents had a call light within reach or a means to call staff for assistance. During two observations, Surveyor noted R44's call light was not within reach. In addition, R44 did not have the correct call light to meet R44's needs according to R44's plan of care. Findings include: From 6/4/24 to 6/6/24, Surveyor reviewed R44's medical record. R44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including senile degeneration of brain, vascular dementia, and encounter for palliative care. R44's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/21/24, contained a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment that indicated R44 was rarely or never understood. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF656Jun 6, 2024

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not develop a comprehensive care plan for 1 resident (R) (R44) of 3 sampled residents. The facility's Matrix and R44's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated R44 received Hospice services. R44 did not have a care plan for Hospice services. Findings include: The facility's Hospice Program policy, revised 11/2016, indicates: The care plan shall be revised and updated as necessary to reflect the resident's current status. On 6/5/24, Surveyor reviewed R44's medical record. R44's was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was admitted to Hospice services on 3/15/24. R44 had diagnoses including senile degeneration of the brain, vascular dementia, and encounter for palliative care. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 39 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 6, 2025Standard1 finding
  • Jan 8, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 6, 2024Standard2 findings
  • Apr 8, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 21, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 27, 2022Standard3 findings
  • Apr 28, 2021Standard1 finding
  • Nov 23, 2020Complaint1 finding
Show the 8 earlier surveys
  • Aug 1, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • May 17, 2018Standard2 findings
  • Jan 27, 2016Standard6 findings
  • Dec 11, 2014Standard4 findings
  • Sep 13, 2012—6 findings
  • Dec 5, 2011—6 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 7, 2011—1 finding
  • Jan 18, 2011—2 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction