Deficiency Index

Edenbrook of Wisconsin Rapids

Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin · CCN 525429

24 surveys since 2010, 7 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
111
Surveys
24
Harm or worse
7
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file19/24

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
80
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
EDEN SENIOR CARE
County
Wood · rural
Medicare-certified since
1989

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=10, floor 20).

Last survey on record

May 20, 2026

173 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.903.71
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.14—
Annual nurse turnover44.1%44.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD777.8%E222.2%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 9 of the 111 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Edenbrook of Wisconsin Rapids, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF677May 20, 2026

    Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs) was provided in a timely and consistent manner for 4 residents (R30, R13, R1, and R38) of 5 sampled residents. R30's call light was shut off prior to staff completing R30's request. Staff did not return in a timely manner to complete cares for R30. R1 stated staff typically take 30 minutes to respond to R1's call light. R13's call light was activated for 14 to 24 minutes before staff provided care. R1 (who lived across the hall) was interviewed and stated R13's call light was previously on for 60 minutes. R38 stated it can take 30 minutes for staff to respond to a call light. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761Jul 25, 2025

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a medication cart was locked when unattended and that medications were stored appropriately. This practice had the potential to affect more than 4 of the 51 residents residing in the facility. On 7/25/25, staff left a medication cart unlocked and unattended on multiple occasions. In addition, staff left medications on top of an unattended medication cart. Findings include:The facility's Administering Medications policy, revised 1/22/24, indicates: .Medication will remain secured in a locked cabinet/cart unless in direct view of the individual administering the medication. 1.On 7/25/25 at 8:28 AM, Surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-C prepare medication. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF559Mar 14, 2023

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not notify the residents of a room change in writing nor notify them of the reason they were being moved for 4 of 4 residents reviewed, Resident (R) R5, R6, R7, and R8. The facility did not explain to residents who were being moved, why they were being moved, nor did they provide written notice. R5 was moved from room [ROOM NUMBER] to 610 on 3/9/23. R5 had a BIMS score of 14 indicating they were cognitively intact. R5 was responsible for self. R6 was moved from room [ROOM NUMBER] to room [ROOM NUMBER] on 3/13/23. R6 had a BIMS score of 15 indicating they were cognitively intact. R6 was responsible for self. R7 was moved from room [ROOM NUMBER] to room [ROOM NUMBER] on 3/9/23. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF610May 20, 2026

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure an allegation of misappropriation was thoroughly investigated for 1 resident (R) (R68) of 1 sampled resident.Housekeeping Supervisor (HS)-E used R68's credit card to pay $1501.97 of personal bills after R68 used HS-E's phone to make purchases. The facility did not thoroughly investigate the allegation of misappropriation.Findings include:The facility's Vulnerable Adult Abuse and Neglect Prevention policy, revised 3/25/25, indicates: It is the policy of the facility to provide professional care and services in an environment that is free from any type of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, or exploitation. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684May 20, 2026

    Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not provide wound care as ordered for 1 resident (R) (R4) of 1 sampled resident. R4 developed a skin tear over a recently healed left posterior thigh wound. Physician orders were not transcribed in R4's medical record to continue treatment to protect the wound. R4's medical record did not indicate the wound was treated or covered as ordered between 5/8/26 and 5/15/26. Findings include: Between 5/19/26 and 5/20/26, Surveyor reviewed R4's medical record. R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including chronic venous hypertension with ulcer and inflammation of left lower extremity and peripheral vascular disease (PVD). […]

Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 111 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 20, 2026Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Jul 25, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 26, 2025Standard2 findings
  • Dec 7, 2023Standard1 finding
  • Mar 14, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 9, 2022Standard2 findings
  • Nov 4, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Nov 6, 2019Standard2 findings
Show the 16 earlier surveys
  • Sep 18, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Dec 18, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 15, 2018Standard11 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 28, 2017Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 20, 2017Standard5 findings
  • Apr 8, 2016Standard6 findings
  • Oct 5, 2015Complaint5 findings
  • Apr 9, 2015Standard6 findings
  • Apr 3, 2014Standard and complaint11 findings
  • Mar 21, 2013—11 findings
  • Aug 14, 2012—5 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 14, 2012—20 findings · 3 harm
  • Sep 21, 2011—4 findings
  • Mar 30, 2011—2 findings
  • Dec 16, 2010—5 findings
  • Sep 10, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction