Deficiency Index

The Springs of Red Oak

Hot Springs, Arkansas · CCN 045404

31 surveys since 2010, 18 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
148
Surveys
31
Harm or worse
18
Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
9
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy9

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file27/31

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
80
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
THE SPRINGS ARKANSAS
County
Garland
Medicare-certified since
2005

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
2
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 67 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Arkansas.

Last survey on record

May 14, 2026

179 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.683.83
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.33—
Annual nurse turnover78.3%46.9%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$14,935 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ15.6%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1161.1%E422.2%F211.1%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 18 of the 148 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5831×

    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.

  • F6091×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6441×

    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at The Springs of Red Oak, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Feb 8, 2024

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure transportation provider safely off-loaded a resident in a wheelchair from the facility transportation van to prevent potential injury for 1 (Resident #1) of 2 (Residents #1 and #2) sampled residents who required transport in a wheelchair on the transportation provider's van. The failed practice had the potential to affect 46 residents that resided in the facility per census received 2/7/2024. This failed practice resulted past Immediate Jeopardy, which caused or could have caused serious harm, injury, or death to Resident #1, who rolled out of the van in a manual wheelchair and fell on the lift that was ground level resulting in a back injury. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 14, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure food preparation and serving pieces were washed, dried, and stored in sanitary conditions for one of one kitchen. Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure food preparation and serving dishware were washed, dried, and stored in sanitary conditions for one of one kitchen that served 35 residents with regular diets, 11 with mechanical soft diets, and two with pureed diets. The findings include: During an observation and concurrent interview on 05/16/2026 at 11:25 AM, the Dietary Manager (DM) retrieved pans that were stored on a shelf under the serving table. Five quarter sheet pans were observed. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Feb 23, 2024

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and/or implement a water management program with measures to minimize the risk for Legionella and other waterborne opportunistic pathogens to reduce the risk for potential infections. This failed practice had the potential to affect 38 residents who resided in the facility. The findings are: 1. On 2/22/24 at 2:06 PM, the Maintenance Supervisor was asked, Do you handle water management here? The Maintenance Supervisor stated, No, I'm not sure what you mean. The Surveyor asked, If the water system has to be tested or checked here, would you be the one doing that? The Maintenance Supervisor stated, Well I'm sure I would be involved in that. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Dec 8, 2022

    Based on observation, record review and interview, dietary staff (failed to) wash their hands between dirty and clean tasks and before handling clean equipment or food items to prevent potential for cross contamination; the facility failed to ensure foods stored in the refrigerator were sealed to minimize the potential for food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen; expired dry food products were promptly removed/discarded on or before the expiration or use by date to prevent the growth of bacteria; and failed to ensure 1 of 2 ice machines was maintained in a clean and sanitary condition to prevent potential contamination for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 6, 2022

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure hot foods were held at 135 Fahrenheit (F) or higher on the steam table to prevent the potential for food-borne illness. This failed practice had the potential to affect in 37 residents who received a meal tray during the evening meal on 7/5/22 as documented on a list provided by the Secretary on 7/6/22 at 9:55 a.m. The findings are: 1. The facility policy Food Temperatures, provided by the Administrator on 7/6/22 at 10:15 a.m. documented, .hot foods may not fall below 135 degrees after cooking . food preparation and service areas will follow these methods: .hold foods . at or above 135 degrees F for hot foods (to keep food out of the temperature danger zone) . 2. […]

Read 37 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 37 of 148 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 14, 2026Standard2 findings
  • Jan 9, 2025Standard8 findings
  • Feb 23, 2024Standard7 findings
  • Feb 8, 2024Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 6, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 24, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 8, 2022Standard6 findings
  • Jul 6, 2022Complaint2 findings
Show the 23 earlier surveys
  • Oct 7, 2021Standard4 findings
  • Sep 11, 2020Standard11 findings
  • May 24, 2019Standard7 findings
  • Oct 12, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 3, 2018Standard4 findings
  • Sep 15, 2017Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 28, 2017Standard3 findings
  • Mar 9, 2017Complaint4 findings · 4 harm
  • Feb 16, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 31, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 10, 2016Standard and complaint21 findings · 8 harm
  • Aug 27, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • May 21, 2015Complaint3 findings
  • Dec 18, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 21, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • May 16, 2014Standard2 findings
  • Jun 28, 2013—7 findings
  • Apr 2, 2013—2 findings
  • Jul 25, 2012—6 findings · 1 harm
  • May 25, 2012—10 findings · 2 harm
  • Jun 23, 2011—1 finding
  • Apr 29, 2011—22 findings
  • Dec 3, 2010—2 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction