Deficiency Index

Bailey Creek Health and Rehab

Texarkana, Arkansas · CCN 045241

25 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
95
Surveys
25
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardy
3
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy3

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file19/25

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
74
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
ANTHONY & BRYAN ADAMS
County
Miller
Medicare-certified since
1994

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
3
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 67 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Arkansas.

Last survey on record

Apr 9, 2026

214 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.533.83
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.33—
Annual nurse turnover50.0%46.9%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD947.4%E947.4%F15.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 19 of the 95 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5841×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Bailey Creek Health and Rehab, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689May 14, 2021

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a planned fall prevention intervention was consistently implemented to prevent a fall with injury for 1 (Resident #30) of 6 (Residents #15, #17, #27, #30, #32, #62) case mix residents who had a history of falls in the past 90 days. This failed practice resulted in past noncompliance at actual harm for Resident #30, who fell and sustained a fractured proximal tibia and fibula, and had the potential to cause more than minimal harm for 12 residents who had falls in the past 90 days, according to a list provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 5/14/21 at 7:50 a.m. The findings are: Resident #30 had diagnoses of [CONDITION(S)], Cognitive Communication Deficit, Muscle Weakness and Lack of Coordination. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Sep 6, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the ice scoop holder was maintained in clean and sanitary condition to prevent potential growth of harmful bacteria that could be transferred to the residents food, failed to ensure opened food items in the freezer were sealed to maintain freshness and prevent potential cross contamination, failed to ensure dietary staff practiced good hand washing techniques to prevent potential cross contamination of food and clean dishes for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. The findings are: 1. On 9/4/24 at 3:20 PM, the following observations were made on the spice rack above the food preparation counter: a. A plastic container of oregano with best by date of 5/24/2024. b. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 29, 2022

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment to minimize the risk of food borne illness for the residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen; food items stored in the refrigerator and freezer were covered or sealed to prevent the potential for cross contamination and/or food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen; failed to keep kitchen vents clean to provide a clean and sanitary environment for food preparation and prevent the potential food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen; floors, dish washer and kitchen, walls, door frames and baseboards were free of debris, dirt, grease, grime, stains, and spills; failed to ensure an ice scoop… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 14, 2021

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure plastic containers of foods items stored in the refrigerator were promptly removed and discarded, and the refrigerator was kept clean to minimize the potential for food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. These failed practices had the potential to affect 63 residents who received meals from the kitchen as documented on a list provided by the Director of Nurse (DON) on 5/14/21. The findings are: 1. On 5/10/21 at 11:56 AM, in the refrigerator, there was applesauce in a clear container covered with a clear plastic wrap and dated 4/19. There was a clear container with Jell-O dated 5/02. There was a clear container with mandarin oranges with a label dated 4/7. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656Apr 9, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to update the Care Plans for two (Resident #54 and Resident #99) of four residents reviewed.The findings include:Resident #54A review of Resident #54's admission Record revealed the facility initially admitted the resident on 06/04/2020, with diagnoses which included unsteadiness on feet, muscle weakness, malnutrition, muscle wasting and atrophy, and a fall from a non-moving wheelchair.A review of Resident #54's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/02/2026, revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 04, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 95 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 9, 2026Standard2 findings
  • Mar 20, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 6, 2024Standard9 findings
  • Feb 27, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 3, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 3, 2023Standard4 findings
  • Oct 19, 2022Complaint3 findings
  • Jul 29, 2022Standard2 findings
Show the 17 earlier surveys
  • May 14, 2021Standard10 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 15, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 17, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Nov 7, 2019Standard10 findings
  • Oct 26, 2018Standard6 findings
  • Mar 28, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 18, 2017Standard5 findings
  • Jul 20, 2017Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
  • Jul 29, 2016Standard9 findings
  • Aug 27, 2015Standard6 findings
  • Oct 23, 2014Standard1 finding
  • Jan 9, 2014—1 finding
  • Feb 22, 2013—6 findings
  • Apr 20, 2012—3 findings
  • Jul 20, 2011—1 finding
  • Mar 31, 2011—3 findings
  • Sep 9, 2010—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction