Deficiency Index

The Oaks

Monroe, Louisiana · CCN 195542

28 surveys since 2011, 7 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
141
Surveys
28
Harm or worse
7
Immediate jeopardy
4
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy4

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file22/28

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
125
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Independent
County
Ouachita
Medicare-certified since
2002

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
3
Staffing
3
Quality measures
1

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 82 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Louisiana.

Last survey on record

Feb 24, 2026

258 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.353.57
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.21—
Annual nurse turnover58.9%45.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$27,005 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG15.6%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD950.0%E844.4%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 18 of the 141 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F5532×

    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.

  • F6092×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F5521×

    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.

  • F5841×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at The Oaks, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Nov 29, 2023

    Based on observations, record reviews and interviews the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from verbal abuse and mental abuse for 2 (#3 and #5) of 4 (#1, #2, #3 and #5) residents reviewed for abuse; evidenced by resident #4 used sexually inappropriate language and gestures toward resident #3 and resident #5. This deficient practice resulted in an actual harm for resident #5, who had moderate cognitive impairment, on 10/18/2023 at 1:15 p.m. when resident #4 made an inappropriate sexual comment and gesture to resident #5. This resulted in resident #5 becoming upset and crying. Resident #5 was assisted to her room and was consoled by staff. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF552Jun 11, 2025

    Based on record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents were informed of the risks, benefits and side effects of psychotropic medications for 6 (#19, #38, #25, #30, #43, #5) of 6 (#19, #38, #25, #30, #43, #5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings: Resident #38 Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed she had an admitted [DATE] with diagnoses which included anxiety and depression. Review of the physician orders revealed Resident #38 received the psychotropic medications Alprazolam 0.25 milligrams (mg) daily and Olanzapine 5 mg daily for the treatment of anxiety and Sertraline 50 mg daily for the treatment of depression. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF605Jun 11, 2025

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents that received psychotropic drugs had a gradual dose reductions, and residents that had orders for psychotropic medications as needed (PRN) were not subjected to chemical restraints for 2 (#5, #19) of 6 (#5, #19, #25, #30, #38, #43) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to ensure: 1). A resident that was on psychotropic drugs received gradual dose reductions (#19); and 2). PRN orders for psychotropic drugs were limited to 14 days (#5, #19). Findings: Resident #19: Record review revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including vascular dementia, generalized anxiety disorder, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689Jun 11, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents were in place for 1 (#23) of 5 (#5, #11, #14, #23, #30) residents investigated for accidents. The failed practice was evidenced by Resident #23 being identified as an unsafe smoker, she was observed smoking without a smoking apron, and was observed having smoking articles in her possession without direct supervision. Findings: Review of the facility`s Smoking Policy, with a revision date of June 2024, revealed in part the following: 4. All unsafe smoking residents shall wear a smoking apron while smoking in the designated smoking area. 15. Smoking articles for residents without independent smoking privileges: a. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF882Jun 11, 2025

    Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist, who was responsible for the facility's infection prevention and control program, had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. Findings: Review of the facility's Infection Control Records revealed there was no documented evidence the Infection Preventionist, S5Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. On 06/10/2025 at 9:50 a.m. an interview with S5LPN revealed she did not have any specialized training in infection prevention. On 06/10/2025 at 1:10 p.m. an interview with S2Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the facility did not have a nurse that had received specialized training in infection prevention.

Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 141 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Feb 24, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 11, 2025Standard7 findings
  • Jun 12, 2024Standard4 findings
  • Nov 29, 2023Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 11, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 12, 2023Standard1 finding
  • Jun 7, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 30, 2022Standard4 findings
Show the 20 earlier surveys
  • May 20, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Aug 15, 2019Standard10 findings
  • Sep 26, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 2, 2018Standard9 findings
  • Sep 14, 2017Standard4 findings
  • Jul 13, 2017Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
  • Oct 6, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Dec 3, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Oct 9, 2014Standard9 findings
  • Jul 30, 2014Complaint3 findings
  • Sep 25, 2013—3 findings
  • Aug 1, 2013—10 findings
  • Jun 21, 2013Complaint9 findings
  • May 16, 2013Complaint13 findings
  • Oct 4, 2012—7 findings · 4 harm
  • Jul 13, 2012—13 findings
  • Jun 13, 2012—2 findings
  • May 17, 2012Complaint4 findings
  • Feb 8, 2012—1 finding
  • May 20, 2011—8 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction