Valley View Health Care Facility
Marksville, Louisiana · CCN 195557
16 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 55
- Surveys
- 16
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 100
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- PLANTATION MANAGEMENT COMPANY
- County
- Avoyelles · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 2002
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 1
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 82 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Louisiana.
Last survey on record
Jan 29, 2026
284 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.45 | 3.57 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.24 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 34.8% | 45.6% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $37,310 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G16.3% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1062.5% | E425.0% | F16.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6563×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6002×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F6092×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Valley View Health Care Facility, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Mar 12, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from staff to resident verbal abuse, for 1 (Resident #3) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents investigated for abuse. Resident #3, a cognitive resident, experienced mental anguish and psychosocial harm as a result of the verbal abuse by staff. This deficient practice resulted in an actual harm for Resident #3 on 02/27/2025 at 12:54 p.m., when Resident #3 reported to the Administrator that while in the activity room, S3 LPN confronted her (Resident #3), engaged in a verbal altercation with her, and shouted at her to shut her mouth. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Oct 30, 2024
FACILITY Infection Control Based on observations, staff interviews and facility policy record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. These deficiencies had the potential to effect 73 residents that resided in the facility. The facility failed to: 1. Ensure the lint drawers on the clothes dryers and the washing machine filters were regularly cleaned; 2. Ensure proper PPE use and infection control measures were used when performing wound care for Resident #32; and 3. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF636Jan 29, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment upon discharge for 1 (Resident #23) of 5 sampled residents investigated for Resident Assessment.Findings: Review of facility policy on [DATE] at 2:25 p.m. titled, MDS Policy and Procedure with an effective date of [DATE] revealed the following part .All Minimum Data Sets (MDS) are to be completed and transmitted according to the most current Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual. The Interdisciplinary Team will assess the resident and document during the 7 day look back and accurately complete the MDS according to the RAI manual. Review of Resident #23's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE] and a discharge date of [DATE]. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF640Jan 29, 2026
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to transmit a completed MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessments within 14 days after completion for 1 (#8) of 1 residents reviewed. Findings: A review of a facility policy on [DATE] at 9:50 a.m., titled MDS Policy and Procedure revealed in part.Policy: All Minimum Data Set (MDS) are to be completed and transmitted according to the most current Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual. Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE], Resident #8 expired in the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #8's Death in a Facility MDS, with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of [DATE], revealed it was completed on [DATE]. Further review revealed it was not transmitted and was 88 days overdue. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Jan 29, 2026
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This failed practice had the potential to affect the 77 residents who resided in the facility. The facility failed to ensure appropriate environmental cleaning and disinfecting solutions were used to disinfect surfaces throughout the facility. Findings: Review of a facility policy on 01/29/2026 at 3:20 p.m. titled, Standard Precautions with an effective date of 11/28/2016 revealed the following in part .Purpose: To prevent the spread of infections. 7. Disinfect or sterilize reusable equipment before use on another resident. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 55 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jan 29, 2026Standard6 findings
- Mar 12, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 30, 2024Standard3 findings
- Mar 27, 2024Complaint3 findings
- Nov 8, 2023Standard2 findings
- Oct 12, 2022Standard5 findings
- Aug 11, 2021Standard2 findings
- Dec 1, 2020Infection control2 findings
Show the 8 earlier surveys
- Oct 10, 2019Standard3 findings
- Jan 25, 2019Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 19, 2018Standard3 findings
- Nov 19, 2015Standard8 findings
- Mar 18, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Oct 16, 2014Standard7 findings
- Dec 12, 2013—2 findings
- Dec 1, 2011—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction