Deficiency Index

The Gardens and Guardian

Lake Charles, Louisiana · CCN 195636

23 surveys since 2012. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2025.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
90
Surveys
23
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2012–2025
’12’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file18/23

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
60
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Independent
County
Calcasieu
Medicare-certified since
2012

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
3
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 22 facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Louisiana.

Last survey on record

Mar 5, 2025

614 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day5.425.06
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.32—
Annual nurse turnover62.5%51.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Payment denials
1

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1071.4%E321.4%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C17.1%
CMS’s current file: 14 of the 90 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6412×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F7552×

    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.

  • F7612×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F5781×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

  • F6401×

    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at The Gardens and Guardian, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, widespreadF812Mar 5, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews, and policy and procedure reviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen to prevent cross contamination and the high likelihood of foodborne illnesses to the 40 residents who ate meals prepared from the facility's kitchen. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on [DATE] at 10:35 AM when the following was observed in the facility's kitchen during the initial tour: 1. Equipment and Food Prep Area a. The ice machine's air filter had an accumulation of lint build up. b. The ice machine's gutter located under the interior portion of the lift cover had an accumulation of lint build up. c. The countertop under a juice dispenser had a dried tan colored residue. d. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Feb 22, 2023

    Based on observations, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control and prevention program and implement accepted infection control practices to help to prevent and control the spread of infectious communicable disease, COVID-19, by failing to ensure laundry staff used the appropriate PPE (personal protective equipment) while handling soiled laundry from COVID-19 isolation rooms. This deficient practice has the potential to affect 41 residents who reside in the facility. Finding: Review of the policy titled Contaminated laundry revealed the following in part: The use of proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) is required while completing laundry tasks. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF867Jan 23, 2024

    Based on review of facility's policy and procedure, record review and interview, the facility failed to effectively implement and monitor the facility's Performance Improvement Project (PIP) implemented on 11/07/2023 by failing to: 1. Conduct weekly meeting from 11/07/2023 to 12/14/2023, 2. Implement interventions in a timely manner, 3. Timely calibrated the facility's scale and, 4. Provide documented evidence of monitoring performance of the identified indicators. This deficient practice had the potential to affect a census of 37 residents. Findings: Review of the facility's Policy titled Weight Monitoring read in part, Compliance Guidelines: 5. A weight monitoring schedule will be developed upon admission for all residents: e. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF610Aug 17, 2022

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to conduct an investigation for an allegation of abuse for 1 (#6) of 6 (#1, #2, #3, #4 #5 and #6) sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's Resident Abuse policy revealed in part . The facility will develop and implement procedures to include .investigation, protection, and reporting/response to insure freedom from physical and mental abuse, neglect and 3. Prevention b. Completion of the appropriate state forms for the reporting of alleged abuse and/or neglect and filing it in a timely manner. With appropriate investigation of it by the DON and/or her designee and records to be maintained and readily assessable to state and local authorities for review. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Aug 17, 2022

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases, COVID-19, and infections by failing to wear appropriate Personnel Protectective Equipment while providing care for a newly admitted unvaccinated resident in isolation for 1 (#3) out of 1 (#3) resident in isolation. Findings: Review of the provider's Infection Control Policy revealed in part .#2. For isolate residents (including recent move-in if unvaccinated) staff must wear all 4 pieces of PPE (Personnel Protective Equipment) while attending to resident. A) Eye protection (goggles/face shield) . B) Mask - Single use only . […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 90 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 5, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jul 10, 2024Standard2 findings
  • Jan 23, 2024Complaint5 findings
  • Jun 21, 2023Standard2 findings
  • Feb 22, 2023Infection control2 findings
  • Aug 17, 2022Complaint6 findings
  • Jun 29, 2022Standard4 findings
  • Jul 15, 2020Infection control1 finding
Show the 15 earlier surveys
  • Jul 1, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jun 13, 2019Standard5 findings
  • Jul 19, 2018Standard8 findings
  • Feb 15, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 10, 2017Standard2 findings
  • Sep 14, 2016Complaint3 findings
  • Jul 27, 2016Standard1 finding
  • Sep 2, 2015Standard10 findings
  • Nov 20, 2014Standard1 finding
  • Aug 5, 2014Complaint5 findings
  • Oct 31, 2013—6 findings
  • Feb 14, 2013—3 findings
  • Dec 14, 2012Standard15 findings
  • Sep 24, 2012—3 findings
  • Feb 28, 2012—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction