Deficiency Index

Progressive Care Center

Shreveport, Louisiana · CCN 195136

27 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
80
Surveys
27
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file20/27

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
48
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Caddo
Medicare-certified since
1978

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
4
Staffing
4
Quality measures
1

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 22 facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Louisiana.

Last survey on record

Jun 11, 2026

151 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day8.545.06
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.93—

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD323.1%E1076.9%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 13 of the 80 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5851×

    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.

  • F6001×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6361×

    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.

  • F6561×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Progressive Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF636Jun 11, 2026

    Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to accurately identify each resident's fall risk status by failing to complete the Fall Risk Assessment for 3 (#1, #2, and #3) of 3 total sampled residents.Findings:Review of the facility's Fall Risk Assessment Policy and Procedure with a review date of 04/01/2026 revealed in part: Policy: It is the policy of the facility to provide an environment that is free from accident hazards over which the facility has control, and provides supervision and assistive devices to each resident to prevent avoidable accidents. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The risk assessment will be completed by the nurse or designee upon admission, quarterly, or when a significant change is identified. 2. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF684Apr 1, 2026

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to ensure 1 (#69) of 1 resident reviewed for wound care received treatment.Findings: Review of Resident #69's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/20/2026 and diagnoses including status post BKA of right lower extremity and status post trans metatarsal [toe] amputation of left foot. Further review of Resident #69's medical record revealed a BIMS score of 15, indicating intact cognition. During an interview on 03/31/2026 at 2:37 p.m. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Apr 1, 2026

    Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program and ensure staff practices were consistent with current infection control principles and practices to prevent infection by:1) failing to ensure staff wash and/or sanitize their hands prior to and in between resident care and medication administration for 2 (#59, #74) of 6 residents observed for medication administration;2) failing to sanitize glucometer machine after use for 1(#59) of 1 resident observed for blood glucose monitoring.Findings: Review of facility policy (no name or date) received 03/31/2026, withPurpose: It is the policy of Progressive Care Center that PCC considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF698Feb 26, 2025

    Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and services consistent with professional standards of practice were implemented for 1 of 1 resident (# 19) reviewed for dialysis. The facility failed to ensure Resident #19's dialysis access site was assessed and monitored every shift. Findings: Review of the facility's Monitor Dialysis Site policy dated 12/15/2023 revealed in part: I. The nurse will ensure that the dialysis access site (e.g. [exempli gratia for example] AV [Arteriovenous] shunt or graft) is checked every shift. The nurse will check for a bruit and palpating for a thrill . II. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF700Feb 26, 2025

    Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure, prior to installation and use of bed rails, residents were assessed for the risk of entrapment, a consent was obtained from the resident or resident's representative, and residents had a physician order and care plan for use of bed rails for 7 (#7, #26, #27, #28. #148, #149, #196) out of 7 (#7, #26, #27, #28. #148, #149, #196) residents reviewed for bed rails. Findings: Review of the facility's Proper use of Side Rails dated 08/28/2017 (approved on 09/14/2017) revealed in part: Purpose: It is the policy of _____ that _____ utilize these guidelines to ensure the safe use of side rails as resident mobility aids and to prohibit the use of side rails as restraints unless necessary to treat a resident's… […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 80 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 11, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 1, 2026Standard3 findings
  • Feb 26, 2025Standard4 findings
  • Aug 14, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • May 7, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 7, 2024Standard2 findings
  • Dec 20, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 15, 2023Standard6 findings
Show the 19 earlier surveys
  • Mar 31, 2022Standard8 findings
  • Nov 13, 2020Standard5 findings
  • May 10, 2019Standard5 findings
  • Apr 13, 2018Standard8 findings
  • May 26, 2017Standard4 findings
  • Jun 16, 2016Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Mar 22, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 4, 2016Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • May 29, 2015Standard6 findings
  • Apr 30, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 26, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 5, 2014Standard3 findings
  • May 22, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • May 30, 2013—1 finding
  • Apr 18, 2013—4 findings
  • Mar 29, 2012—3 findings
  • Jan 19, 2012—3 findings
  • Dec 17, 2010—1 finding
  • Sep 29, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction