The Blossoms at Mountain View Rehab & Nursing Cen
Mountain View, Arkansas · CCN 045146
25 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 106
- Surveys
- 25
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 97
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- THE BLOSSOMS REHAB & NURSING CENTER
- County
- Stone · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1989
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 67 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Arkansas.
Last survey on record
Mar 26, 2026
228 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.20 | 3.83 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.42 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 38.7% | 46.9% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D240.0% | E240.0% | F120.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at The Blossoms at Mountain View Rehab & Nursing Cen, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Apr 15, 2022
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a mechanical lift was used to complete a transfer according to the plan of care resulting in a fall, on-coming staff and the physician were informed of the fall, and thorough assessments were completed when the resident continued to complain of pain resulting in the delay in diagnosis [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . These failed practices resulted in actual harm to Resident #73, who had a fall due to staff not using a mechanical lift during a transfer. The findings are: Resident #73 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 26, 2026
Based on observations, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff consistently performed hand hygiene, failed to ensure staff consistently covered mustache and hair during food preparation, and failed to ensure gloves were worn during food preparation, during one of two meals observed. The findings include:Incident #1During an observation and concurrent interview on 03/23/2026 at 10:20 AM, Dietary Aide (DA) #1 was observed actively preparing food for the residents without a hair covering over a mustache that was approximately one half (1/2) to one (1) inch long. DA #1 did have a beard cover on that did not cover the mustache area. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 15, 2022
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the kitchen floor was clean, dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment and food items, leftover food items were dated and hot foods were served at or above 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) to potential food borne illness for residents who received meal trays from 1 of 1 kitchen The failed practices had the potential to affect (how many?) residents who received meals from the kitchen (total census: 75), as documented on a list provided by Dietary Employee. The findings are: 1. On 4/11/2022 at 11:28 AM, the following observations were made with the Dietary Supervisor.: a. There was an unsealed box of coffee filters on the counter by the steam table. a. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jan 29, 2021
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure expired food items were promptly removed /discarded on or before the expiration or use by dates; food items stored in the refrigerator or freezer were sealed or covered; failed to ensure dietary staff washed their hands and changed gloves between dirty and clean tasks and before handling clean equipment or food items to minimize the potential for food borne illness for residents who received meals; an ice scoop holder and ice machines were maintained in clean and sanitary condition to decrease the potential for food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen; These failed practices had the potential to affect 66 residents who received meals from the kitchen (Total census: 66) as documented on a list… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657Sep 12, 2024
Based on observations, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised with interventions to provide proper care to 2 of (Residents #51 and #57) of 2 sampled residents. These are our findings: A review of the Order Summary revealed Resident #51 had diagnoses of stroke, dementia, history of falling, and anxiety disorder. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/17/2024 revealed Resident #57 scored an 8 (8 to 12 indicates moderate cognitive impairment) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). A review of the Care Plan revealed that interventions for pressure reducing devices and fall mats were not added to the care plan. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 106 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 26, 2026Standard1 finding
- Sep 12, 2024Standard2 findings
- Jul 6, 2023Standard2 findings
- Apr 15, 2022Standard10 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 1, 2021Complaint4 findings
- Jan 29, 2021Standard8 findings
- Dec 31, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Oct 23, 2020Complaint9 findings
Show the 17 earlier surveys
- Sep 11, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Jun 23, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Aug 9, 2019Standard8 findings
- Mar 28, 2019Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 16, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Aug 24, 2018Standard and complaint5 findings
- Aug 18, 2017Standard1 finding
- Jul 21, 2016Standard3 findings
- Aug 14, 2015Standard8 findings
- Jul 25, 2014Standard3 findings
- Aug 20, 2013—1 finding
- Jun 21, 2013—2 findings
- May 10, 2013—1 finding
- Jun 15, 2012—2 findings
- May 11, 2012—12 findings
- Jul 29, 2011—10 findings
- Nov 5, 2010—6 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction