Deficiency Index

Swaim Health Center

Newville, Pennsylvania · CCN 395375

28 surveys since 2010, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
90
Surveys
28
Harm or worse
6
Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
2
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file22/28

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
67
Ownership
Non profit - Church related
Chain
PRESBYTERIAN SENIOR LIVING
County
Cumberland
Medicare-certified since
1977

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
3
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 47 not-for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Pennsylvania.

Last survey on record

Apr 6, 2026

217 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.634.44
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.94—
Annual nurse turnover49.3%37.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$8,278 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ18.3%K—L—
Actual harmG18.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD866.7%E216.7%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 12 of the 90 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F6862×

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

  • F6001×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6411×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F6841×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Swaim Health Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Apr 6, 2026

    Based on clinical record review, observations, facility document review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility displayed past non-compliance by failure to implement interventions, supervision, and effective safety measures to prevent elopement of a resident identified as being at risk for elopement and exhibiting exit seeking behaviors (Resident 1). This failure placed one additional resident who was identified as at risk for elopement and independent with ambulation in an Immediate Jeopardy situation (Resident 4).Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Wandering Management Policy, created February 28, 2022, read, in part, Objective: To prevent wandering that could lead to resident elopement and to identify action steps to be… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jan 27, 2025

    Based on clinical record review, review of facility investigation documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility displayed past non-compliance in its failure to ensure that interventions were put into place to prevent accident hazards during a transfer, resulting in actual harm as evidenced by a skin tear requiring treatment, for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), abnormalities of gait and mobility, and muscle weakness. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF658Aug 27, 2026

    Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards for insulin administration for one of two residents reviewed (Resident 1).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled IIB14: Injectable Medication Administration, with a last review date of March 31, 2026, revealed in part, Purpose: To administer medications via subcutaneous, intradermal and intramuscular routes in a safe, accurate, and effective manner. Sites for Administration: Subcutaneous: Abdomen (minimally 2 below and left or right of umbilicus for heparins) Upper arm - Fatty tissue over triceps Top of thigh - Fatty tissue over anterolateral thigh. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Aug 27, 2026

    Based on facility policy reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in one of two nourishment refrigerators (Nursing Nourishment Center) and on the tray service line in the main dining room.Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Providing Outside Foods or Beverages to Residents, with a policy review date of March 31, 2026, revealed, in part, 5. All food must be labeled with a received date, residents name, room number when put in the refrigerator. Review of facility policy, titled Employee Sanitary Practices, with a policy review date of March 31, 2026, revealed, in part, 6. Use utensils to handle foods. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF684Jul 2, 2025

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice to meet each resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for three of 16 residents reviewed (Residents 5, 22, and 55). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Wound Care, with a last review date of August 14, 2024, revealed, in part, 15. Treatments will be performed by personnel in accordance with licensure practice acts. Review of facility policy, titled Intravenous Device Care, with a last review date of August 14, 2024, revealed, in part, 3. […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 90 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 27, 2026Standard2 findings
  • Apr 6, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jul 2, 2025Standard4 findings
  • Jan 27, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Aug 14, 2024Standard3 findings
  • Oct 12, 2023Standard1 finding
  • Aug 17, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 21, 2021Standard9 findings
Show the 20 earlier surveys
  • Dec 8, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Feb 27, 2020Standard4 findings
  • Mar 8, 2019Standard4 findings
  • Mar 25, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 26, 2018Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 26, 2018Standard8 findings
  • Jun 14, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 10, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 13, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 2, 2017Standard1 finding
  • Jul 28, 2016Complaint5 findings · 2 harm
  • Feb 24, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 16, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Oct 1, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 26, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Feb 20, 2014—6 findings
  • Jan 17, 2013—5 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 12, 2012—14 findings
  • Feb 11, 2011—4 findings
  • Oct 14, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction