Highlands At Wyomissing
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania · CCN 395800
13 surveys since 2012. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2025.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 23
- Surveys
- 13
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 80
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Berks
- Medicare-certified since
- 1989
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=12, floor 20).
Last survey on record
May 21, 2025
537 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 6.67 | 4.44 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.24 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 27.7% | 37.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D583.3% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B116.7% | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Highlands At Wyomissing, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF804May 21, 2025
Based on observation, facility policy review, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that hot beverages were monitored and served at a safe temperature on the nursing units which placed residents at risk for burn injuries. ([NAME] Court, units 100, 200, and 300) This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation. Findings include: Review of documentation by the American Burn Association's Burn Prevention Committee entitled, Scald Injury Prevention, revealed that a scald injury occurred when a hot liquid damaged one or more layers of skin and hot beverages were a frequent source of scald burns. Older adults were the most frequent victims of scald injuries due to thin skin, reduced mobility, and reduced ability to feel heat. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF943Jul 8, 2022
Based on facility policy review, personnel record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff orientation included in-service training on the identification, prevention and reporting of resident abuse for five of five sampled staff. (NA 1, NA 2, LPN 1, LPN 2, RN 1) Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled, Resident Abuse Policy, dated December 30, 2021, revealed that during orientation and annually thereafter, staff were to receive in-service training on identification, prevention, and reporting of resident abuse, exploitation, and neglect, and the improper use of physical and chemical restraints. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF640May 21, 2025
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to electronically transmit encoded Minimum Data Set (MDS) data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) within 14 days after the facility completed the resident assessment for one of three sampled residents who were discharged from the facility. (Resident 45) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 45's discharge MDS assessment was completed on December 20, 2024, but had not been exported as of May 20, 2025. In an interview on May 21, 2025, at 11:00 a.m., Registered Nurse 1 confirmed that the MDS assessment had not been exported.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF550Jul 18, 2024
Based on a group interview and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident's call bell was answered in a timely manner for three of four alert and oriented residents. (Residents 17, 20, 58) Findings include: During a group interview on July 17, 2024, at 9:40 a.m., Residents 17, 20, and 58 reported that it takes long periods of time of (30 minutes or more) for staff to answer their call bells and get assistance. In an interview on July 18, 2024, at 11:00 a.m., the Administrator revealed that staff was expected to respond to a call light within six minutes. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF692Jul 18, 2024
Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor and assess nutritional status for two of 15 sampled residents. (Residents 18 and 42) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled Weight Policy, last reviewed February 19, 2024, revealed that the purpose of the policy was to monitor residents' weight status. When a resident's recorded weight showed a five percent difference, plus or minus, from the previous weight, a re-weight was to be obtained. The provider was to be notified of any weight loss or weight gain of five percent or greater. Weights were to be reviewed weekly by the dietician, their designee, and nursing to determine significant changes. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 23 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 21, 2025Standard3 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 18, 2024Standard2 findings
- Jun 29, 2023Standard1 finding
- Jul 8, 2022Standard2 findings
- Aug 19, 2021Standard4 findings
- Feb 21, 2020Standard2 findings
- Mar 28, 2019Standard1 finding
- Feb 23, 2018Standard2 findings
Show the 5 earlier surveys
- Nov 16, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Feb 21, 2014—1 finding
- Mar 7, 2013—2 findings
- Oct 25, 2012—1 finding
- Apr 27, 2012—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction