Steubenville Country Club Manor
Steubenville, Ohio · CCN 366241
29 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 205
- Surveys
- 29
- Harm or worse
- 11
- Immediate jeopardy
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 54
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Jefferson
- Medicare-certified since
- 2002
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 188 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Ohio.
Last survey on record
Feb 13, 2025
634 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.58 | 3.57 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.63 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 51.7% | 46.9% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J11.2% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G22.4% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D5567.1% | E1012.2% | F1417.1% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6894×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F8424×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F5783×
Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
- F6103×
Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
- F6863×
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Steubenville Country Club Manor, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684Jul 7, 2023
Based on observation, medical record review, review of Fire Department emergency response documentation, emergency room documentation, review of the facility policy titled Medical Emergencies, and interviews with residents, staff, and family, the facility failed to provide timely care and services for the monitoring and treatment of sign and symptoms of hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) for Resident #38, who had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy with serious life-threatening harm on 06/08/23 at approximately 11:30 P.M. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF757Sep 21, 2023
THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, review of information from diabetes.org and interview the facility failed to adequately monitor Resident #40 related to the administration of diabetic medication. Actual harm occurred on 07/22/23 when Resident #40 was found by staff with a change in mental status/condition after oral hypoglycemic medications had been adjusted and no routine blood glucose monitoring was ordered/completed. Resident #40 was emergently transferred to the hospital and subsequently admitted with a diagnosis of hypoglycemia (low blood glucose/sugar level). This affected one resident (#40) of three residents reviewed for blood glucose monitoring. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF728May 30, 2024
Based on review of personnel files and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing assistants received required training prior to providing direct care to residents. This had the potential to affect all 46 residents. Findings include: 1. On [DATE] at 11::15 A.M., Employee #145 (who introduced herself as a nurse aide in training) stated she had not yet started nurse aide training classes. Employee #145 stated she had worked in a group home in the past. Employee #145 stated she had four 12 hours days of orientation with another aide. Employee #145 indicated her duties included helping with meals, providing showers, and providing incontinence care. Employee #145 stated she was performing all the same duties as state tested nursing assistants. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF835May 30, 2024
Based on record review and investigation, the facility failed to ensure administrative staff maintained records in a secure and accessible area and failed to ensure incidents of elopement were investigated and evaluated to ensure safety of wandering residents. This affected all 46 residents. Findings include: 1. During an entrance conference with the Administrator on 05/16/24 at 12:51 P.M., a request was made for infection control surveillance logs for the past three months. On 05/16/24 at 4:50 P.M., the Administrator stated he could not locate evidence of infection control logs since February 2024. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880May 30, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide evidence of infection control surveillance and failed to implement proper hand hygiene and use of personal protective equipment (PPE) during care of a feeding tube. This affected Residents #3 and #22 and had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 46. Findings include: 1. During an entrance conference with the Administrator on 05/16/24 at 12:51 P.M., a request was made for infection control surveillance logs for the past three months. On 05/16/24 at 4:50 P.M., the Administrator stated he could not locate evidence of infection control logs since February 2024. […]
Read 30 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 30 of 205 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Feb 13, 2025Standard7 findings
- Oct 2, 2024Complaint2 findings
- May 30, 2024Complaint13 findings
- Mar 15, 2024Complaint5 findings
- Sep 21, 2023Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 2, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Jul 21, 2023Complaint4 findings
- Jul 7, 2023Complaint17 findings · 1 harm
Show the 21 earlier surveys
- Apr 4, 2023Complaint4 findings
- Jan 6, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Sep 12, 2022Standard19 findings
- Apr 15, 2021Complaint3 findings
- Jan 12, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Dec 7, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Nov 30, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Oct 30, 2020Infection control4 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 15, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Nov 27, 2019Standard13 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 25, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Sep 27, 2018Standard27 findings · 2 harm
- Aug 16, 2018Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 7, 2017Standard5 findings
- Sep 1, 2016Standard6 findings
- Jun 29, 2015Standard14 findings · 4 harm
- Mar 20, 2014Standard5 findings
- Jan 8, 2013—20 findings
- Sep 9, 2011—14 findings
- Feb 15, 2011—4 findings
- Sep 2, 2010—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction