Sterling Park Health Care Center
Waite Park, Minnesota · CCN 245375
25 surveys since 2010, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 148
- Surveys
- 25
- Harm or worse
- 5
- Immediate jeopardy
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 40
- Ownership
- For profit - Partnership
- Chain
- ACCURA HEALTHCARE
- County
- Stearns
- Medicare-certified since
- 1986
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 55 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Minnesota.
Last survey on record
Aug 1, 2025
465 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.19 | 3.62 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.22 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 65.3% | 50.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Payment denials
- 1
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J15.3% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1578.9% | E— | F210.5% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C15.3% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6842×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F8832×
Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
- F5541×
Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
- F5781×
Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Sterling Park Health Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF578Aug 1, 2025
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to follow process to ensure advanced directives were accurately documented and updated on the resident's electronic health record (EHR) banner, physician orders and Physician's Orders for Life Saving Treatment (POLST) which affected 2 of 16 residents (R35 and R19) reviewed for advance directives. These findings constituted an immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation for R35 and R19 who would not have received cardiopulmonary resuscitation measures (CPR) according to their wishes. The IJ began on [DATE], when R35's POLST, indicating R35's wishes for resuscitation was signed by the medical provider and it was not changed within the facility's EHR to reflect R35's wishes. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF727Aug 1, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a Registered Nurse (RN) was on-site for at least 8 consecutive hours on a daily basis. Lack of consistent RN coverage may result in delayed assessment, clinical decision-making, or care interventions, potentially jeopardizing resident health and safety. This failure had the potential to negatively impact resident care and oversight.Findings include: Facility payroll based journal (PBJ) staffing data report for fiscal year 2025, quarter 2 (January 1- March 31) triggered excessively low weekend staffing. Facility assessment dated [DATE]- indicated facility need for 1 RN for 40 residents. Facility staffing schedules indicated RNs were scheduled for 12-hour shifts (6am-6:30pm, and 6pm-6:30am). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 2, 2024
Base on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to store and label food properly, dispose of undated and expired food items, to reduce the risk of food borne illness. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 34 residents who were provided meals from the kitchen. Findings include: During initial tour of kitchen on [DATE], at 11:33 a.m., with dietary manager (DM) the following was observed: - in the room with the serving window, on the back wall was a three door free standing cooler. Behind the first door was two plastic serving cups of jello uncovered/undated, three plastic serving cups of fruit cocktail uncovered/undated. Behind the third door a meal that had been saved had no label of when it was placed in the cooler. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF550Aug 6, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents' grooming needs were met for 1 of 2 residents (R12) in the sample who were observed for the provision of activities of daily living cares. Findings include: R12's electronic health record (EHR) printed 8/6/26, indicated R5's diagnoses included; acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (the bodies tissues do not get enough oxygen to function), pleural effusion (an abnormal buildup of fluid between the tissues that line the lungs and the inside of the chest cavity), repeated falls, and wedge compression fractures of T11-T12 vertebra. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF582Aug 6, 2026
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide the required Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNFABN) (CMS-10055) to 1 of 3 residents (R49) reviewed for beneficiary notices.Findings include:R49's electronic health record (EHR) indicated Medicare Part A coverage for skilled nursing facility services ended on 2/2/26. Following the end of Medicare Part A coverage, R49 remained in the facility and transitioned to private-pay status.R49's EHR and beneficiary notice documentation lacked evidence that a completed SNFABN (CMS-10055), had been provided to R49 and/or R49's representative when Medicare Part A covered ended and R49 became financially responsible for continued services.During an interview on 8/4/26 at 11:32 a.m., the Assistant… […]
Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 148 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 6, 2026Standard and complaint8 findings
- Aug 1, 2025Standard and complaint8 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 20, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Feb 26, 2025Complaint1 finding
- May 2, 2024Standard7 findings
- Aug 9, 2023Standard2 findings
- Jan 6, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Nov 29, 2022Complaint1 finding
Show the 17 earlier surveys
- Sep 8, 2022Standard1 finding
- Apr 26, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Feb 24, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Nov 20, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Apr 30, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Jan 24, 2020Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 9, 2020Standard and complaint7 findings
- Jan 17, 2019Standard11 findings
- Dec 15, 2017Standard25 findings
- Nov 15, 2016Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 21, 2016Standard11 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 13, 2015Standard4 findings
- Oct 16, 2014Standard1 finding
- Dec 20, 2013—14 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 11, 2013—12 findings
- Nov 3, 2011—18 findings
- Nov 18, 2010—8 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction