Springside Rehabilitation and Skilled Care Center
Pittsfield, Massachusetts · CCN 225386
25 surveys since 2010, 11 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 91
- Surveys
- 25
- Harm or worse
- 11
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 135
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Berkshire
- Medicare-certified since
- 1990
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 96 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Massachusetts.
Last survey on record
Sep 29, 2025
406 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.55 | 3.59 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.36 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 49.4% | 34.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1583.3% | E211.1% | F15.6% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8422×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F5571×
Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
- F5841×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
- F6361×
Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Springside Rehabilitation and Skilled Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, patternF725Feb 5, 2021
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of two nursing units, the COVID (positive) Unit (A-Wing), during the second week of January 2021 (with an average daily census of 50 residents), the Facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing levels were maintained to safely and adequately meet resident's needs per their plans of care. The Facility failed to ensure that there was sufficient staffing levels to provide the level of assistance needed for residents with physical limitations, failed to ensure call lights were responded to timely, and failed to ensure residents received assistance with toileting and personal hygiene care needs when requested and per the plan of care, which resulted in residents becoming, angry, upset and crying after being left in soiled briefs and unable to… […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jun 7, 2023
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who required extensive assistance of two staff members and the use of a mechanical lift for all transfers, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with the necessary level of staff assistance and that assistive equipment (lift pad) was positioned correctly, in an effort to maintain Resident #1's safety during a mechanical lift transfer to prevent incidents/accidents resulting in an injury. On 05/16/23, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1, without another staff member present to assist her, attempted to transfer Resident #1 with a mechanical lift. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Feb 5, 2021
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for two of six sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #5), who resided on the COVID Unit, and required staff assistance with incontinence care, the Facility failed to ensure they were free from abuse, including neglect with emotional harm, when Resident #1 and Resident #5 reported being in physical pain, emotionally upset and angry, when staff failed to respond to their call lights and requests for assistance with personal care needs. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Freedom from Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation, dated 4/27/17, indicated that all residents are protected from any form of abuse, which includes neglect. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 5, 2021
Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of six sampled residents (Resident #3), who was assessed as being at increased risk for falls, was non-ambulatory and totally dependent on staff for all care needs, the Facility failed to maintain his/her safety to prevent an incident/accident with injury, when on 1/19/21 after Resident #3 had attempted to get out of bed unassisted by staff earlier in the shift, Resident #3 was found an hour later on the floor after an unwitnessed fall, he/she had an abrasion to his/her right knee and right shoulder, complained of back pain, and was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department for further evaluation. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Mar 6, 2023
Based on record review and interview, the facility and its staff failed to provide a designated person that met regulatory requirements, to serve as the Director of Food and Nutrition Services when a full-time Dietitian was not employed. Findings include: During an interview on 3/3/23 at 1:01 P.M., the Food Service Director (FSD) said that she had worked as the FSD at the facility for about one week. The FSD said she was not a Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), or Certified Food Service Manager (CFSM), did not have an associate degree or higher in food service management, and did not have two years' experience in the position of Director of Food and Nutrition Services in a nursing facility setting. […]
Read 30 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 30 of 91 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Sep 29, 2025Standard2 findings
- Jul 16, 2024Standard6 findings
- Sep 27, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jun 7, 2023Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 6, 2023Standard9 findings
- Feb 17, 2022Infection control1 finding
- Jul 15, 2021Standard11 findings
- May 5, 2021Complaint1 finding
Show the 17 earlier surveys
- Feb 5, 2021Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
- Mar 3, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Nov 5, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Jul 1, 2019Standard and complaint10 findings
- Mar 28, 2018Standard2 findings
- Jan 23, 2018Complaint3 findings
- Feb 1, 2017Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 21, 2016Standard5 findings
- Nov 2, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Sep 9, 2015Standard6 findings
- Jul 17, 2014Standard6 findings · 2 harm
- Jun 24, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Dec 11, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
- Jun 3, 2013—3 findings
- Jan 6, 2011—8 findings
- Oct 12, 2010—2 findings · 2 harm
- Sep 3, 2010—1 finding · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction