Bear Hill Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center
Stoneham, Massachusetts · CCN 225272
18 surveys since 2011, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 76
- Surveys
- 18
- Harm or worse
- 5
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 169
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- COLEV GESTETNER
- County
- Middlesex
- Medicare-certified since
- 1983
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 96 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Massachusetts.
Last survey on record
Jan 15, 2026
298 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.00 | 3.59 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.49 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 37.1% | 34.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $16,146 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G13.7% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1763.0% | E622.2% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B13.7% | C27.4% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6563×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6842×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6952×
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
- F8422×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F5801×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Bear Hill Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Dec 14, 2023
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to follow the fall plan of care for 1 Resident (#124) out of a total of 36 sampled Residents. Subsequently, Resident #124 sustained a fall requiring hospitalization and was diagnosed with subdural hematoma, (bleeding that occurs within the skull but outside the actual brain tissue). Findings include: Review of the facility's Fall Prevention and Fall Committee Policy and Procedure, dated 6/7/22 indicated: *All residents who on admission, readmission or after an actual fall score at high risk for falls will have immediate interventions implemented for prevention of falls. *Any falls prevention interventions should minimize the resident's risk for falling and maintain functional independence and mobility. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Oct 21, 2022
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure interventions to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer were developed and implemented for 1 Resident (#82), which resulted in the development of a Stage IV pressure ulcer, out of a total sample of 29 residents. Findings include: Review of the Facility's policy, entitled 'Weekly Skin Assessment' dated as revised 6/8/22, included the following: Purpose: Early identification of alterations in skin integrity and ongoing assessment to intervene and prevent changed in resident skin condition. Policy: All residents will have a full body assessment on day of admission and weekly thereafter. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF684Jan 15, 2026
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide quality of care in accordance with professional standards for four Residents (#154, #40, #118, and #58) out of a total sample of 31 residents. Specifically,1. For Resident #154, the facility failed to document and assess the alteration of the skin on his/her lower extremities to determine if the areas were healing or worsening and failed to report the condition of Resident 154's lower extremities to the medical provider. 2. For Resident #40, the facility failed to implement an order for a diuretic after a significant weight gain for Resident #40, who has congestive heart failure and edema.3. For Resident #118, the facility failed to label wound dressings after changing Resident #118's dressing.4. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF677Dec 19, 2024
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), for two Residents (#61 and #241) out of a total sample of 30 residents. specifically 1. For Resident #61 the facility failed to provide supervision with meals. 2. For Resident #241 the facility failed to provide incontinent care or hygiene care. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADL's), Supporting, undated, indicated the following: Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1(c). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF842Dec 19, 2024
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately document in the clinical record for 4 Residents (#18, #43, #241 and #110) out of a total sample of 30 residents. Specifically: 1. for Resident #18 the facility failed to accurately document the changing of the oxygen tubing. 2. For Resident #43 the facility failed to accurately document the sex of the Resident. 3. For Resident #241 the facility failed to accurately document the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care provided. 4. For Resident #110, the facility failed to ensure staff accurately documented the completion of wound treatments provided. […]
Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 76 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jan 15, 2026Standard7 findings
- Dec 19, 2024Standard4 findings
- Dec 14, 2023Standard16 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 21, 2022Standard14 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 8, 2022Complaint2 findings
- Jan 12, 2022Infection control1 finding
- Dec 23, 2020Infection control2 findings
- Aug 27, 2020Infection control1 finding
Show the 10 earlier surveys
- Jan 9, 2020Standard8 findings
- Jan 31, 2019Standard5 findings
- Sep 19, 2018Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
- Oct 12, 2017Standard3 findings
- Jan 6, 2017Standard2 findings
- Jan 12, 2016Standard1 finding
- Oct 10, 2014Standard1 finding
- Apr 1, 2014Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 20, 2012—4 findings
- Aug 24, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction