Smith Center Health and Rehab
Smith Center, Kansas · CCN 175295
16 surveys since 2011, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 98
- Surveys
- 16
- Harm or worse
- 4
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 45
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- MISSION HEALTH COMMUNITIES
- County
- Smith · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1994
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=15, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Apr 16, 2025
572 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.67 | 3.78 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.94 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 22.5% | 50.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $16,153 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J17.1% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D428.6% | E428.6% | F321.4% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C214.3% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F7612×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
- F5801×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F5821×
Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Smith Center Health and Rehab, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jan 21, 2025
The facility identified a census of 35 residents with three residents reviewed for accidents. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe environment free from preventable accidents for Resident (R) 1. On 01/15/25 at approximately 09:20 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M and CNA N transferred R1 from his wheelchair to his recliner using a Hoyer (total body mechanical lift) lift. The CNAs used the lift to suspend R1 into the air due to limited space in R1's room. CNA M turned around to position R1's recliner for R1 to sit in, turned back around to assist R1 into the recliner, and the right top lift sling strap dislodged and R1 slid out of the lift sling onto the floor. R1 hit the right side of his head and came to rest on his right side. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF610Jun 15, 2021
The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included three residents, with three reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to assess Resident (R) 1 (a cognitively intact resident) after she alleged Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M touched her inappropriately. R1 reported the allegation to the Director of Nursing (DON), who failed to thoroughly investigate the incident and failed to suspend CNA M for almost three hours after the allegation (after finishing his shift), which allowed CNA M to care for R1 again and care for other residents in the facility. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Apr 16, 2025
The facility had a census of 37 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide the services of a full-time Certified Dietary Manager for the 37 residents who resided in the facility and received their meals from the kitchen. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate nutrition. Findings included: - On 04/14/25 at 09:00 AM, observation dietary staff in the kitchen preparing the breakfast meal. On 04/14/25 at 09:10 AM, Dietary Staff BB verified she was not a Certified Dietary Manager. Dietary Staff BB stated the facility had one resident with a pureed diet. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 16, 2025
The facility had a census of 37 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store food by professional standards for food service safety in the nourishment refrigerator located in the south hall. The facility failed to cover two fluorescent light fixtures in one of one dining room. This placed the residents, who received their food items from the south nourishment refrigerator/freezer, at risk for foodborne illness. This also placed the residents who ate in the facility's dining room at risk of getting foreign objects in their meals. Findings included: - On 04/14/25 at 09:00 AM in the south hall resident nourishment freezer revealed the following: 1. A frozen banquet salisbury meal with an expiration date of 12/24. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Feb 17, 2022
The facility had a census of 43 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in one of one facility kitchen. This placed the 43 residents who received food from the facility kitchen at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: - On 02/10/22 at 09:45 AM, observation revealed the following: The outer layer of wood peeling from eight under counter cupboards, two upper cabinets by the eyewash station, and nine drawers. The shelf above the stove had sticky gray substance. Missing mopboard, approximately 18 inches (in), below the three sink and approximately 4 feet (ft) by the steam table. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 98 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 16, 2025Standard7 findings
- Jan 21, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 7, 2023Standard3 findings
- Feb 17, 2022Standard and complaint3 findings
- Jun 15, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 6, 2020Standard9 findings
- Feb 25, 2019Standard5 findings
- Nov 16, 2017Standard and complaint10 findings
Show the 8 earlier surveys
- Nov 16, 2016Complaint3 findings
- Apr 18, 2016Standard8 findings
- Oct 8, 2015Complaint4 findings
- Feb 18, 2015Standard and complaint10 findings
- Jun 11, 2014Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 16, 2014—10 findings
- Dec 4, 2012—13 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 17, 2011—8 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction