Deficiency Index

Sinking Spring Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation

Sinking Spring, Pennsylvania · CCN 395541

27 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2021.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
90
Surveys
27
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file16/27

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
214
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
GENESIS HEALTHCARE
County
Berks
Medicare-certified since
1982

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
2
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 173 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Pennsylvania.

Last survey on record

Mar 4, 2026

250 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.203.39
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.35—
Annual nurse turnover46.1%49.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$17,342 across 1 penalty
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ13.1%K—L—
Actual harmG26.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2268.8%E13.1%F26.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B26.3%C26.3%
CMS’s current file: 32 of the 90 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5503×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5843×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F6002×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Sinking Spring Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Jan 8, 2026

    Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from physical and mental abuse for one of seven sampled residents. (Resident 1) This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation.Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Abuse Prohibition, last reviewed April 17, 2025, revealed that the facility prohibited abuse, mistreatment, and neglect for all residents. The policy further defined abuse as willful infliction, meaning the individual acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF550Jan 8, 2026

    Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services in a manner that respected each resident's dignity and preferences to promote quality of life, resulting in psychosocial harm for one of seven sampled residents. (Resident 1)Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Treatment: Considerate and Respectful, reviewed February 21, 2025, revealed that residents were to be groomed as they wished to be groomed, which included maintaining the resident's personal preference regarding hair style and length. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included chronic pain syndrome, major depressive disorder, and anxiety. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Mar 27, 2025

    Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, review of facility documentation, and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from mental and/or physical abuse for two residents (Residents 1 and 2), which resulted in psychosocial harm for one of seven residents reviewed. (Resident 1) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Abuse Prohibition, last reviewed February 21, 2025, revealed that instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Oct 27, 2022

    Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, review of facility documentation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent neglect that resulted in a serious injury and actual harm, (bilateral fractured shoulders), for one of seven sampled residents who was dependent on staff for assistance with transfers. (Resident 132) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled Injury Prevention Lifts and Injury-Reducing Devices Manual, dated October 13, 2022, revealed that when utilizing lifts it was advisable to have two staff present to stabilize and support the resident. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 132 had diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Oct 22, 2021

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and treatment in accordance with physician's orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . (Resident 205). This deficiency is cited as past noncompliance. Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 205 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Clinical record documentation also reflected that the resident had a [CONDITION(S)]. (A [CONDITION(S)] is a surgically created opening through the neck into the trachea - the windpipe - into which a tube is placed. Once the [CONDITION(S)] is created and a [CONDITION(S)] tube inserted, the person breathes through this tube. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 90 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 28, 2026Standard5 findings
  • Mar 4, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 8, 2026Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
  • Sep 26, 2025Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Jul 9, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 27, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 17, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 27, 2024Standard and complaint9 findings
Show the 19 earlier surveys
  • Jul 24, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 6, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 28, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 29, 2023Standard9 findings
  • Oct 27, 2022Standard9 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 22, 2021Standard8 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 7, 2020Standard3 findings
  • May 22, 2019Standard5 findings
  • Jul 18, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • May 24, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 20, 2018Standard2 findings
  • Aug 31, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • May 5, 2017Standard4 findings
  • Apr 3, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 22, 2016Standard8 findings
  • May 8, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Apr 25, 2014Standard4 findings
  • May 3, 2013—1 finding
  • May 27, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction