Signature Healthcare of Norfolk
Norfolk, Virginia · CCN 495068
17 surveys since 2010, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 121
- Surveys
- 17
- Harm or worse
- 9
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 169
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE
- County
- Norfolk City
- Medicare-certified since
- 1970
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=10, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Jul 21, 2023
1,207 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.41 | 3.34 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.47 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 45.4% | 50.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G36.4% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2348.9% | E1531.9% | F24.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B36.4% | C12.1% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6573×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
- F5842×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
- F6232×
Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
- F6252×
Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
- F6412×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Signature Healthcare of Norfolk, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF557Jul 21, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat residents with respect and dignity by not ensuring the residents' rights to retain personal possessions for two of two sampled residents (Residents (R)52 and R82) reviewed for resident rights. This failure had the possibility to have a negative impact on numerous residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of R52's Face Sheet, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included flaccid hemiplegia affecting the left non dominant side, cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of unspecified cerebral artery, heart failure, type II diabetes, major depressive disorder, major… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF623Jul 21, 2023
Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received written discharge notices at the time of transfer to the hospital for four (Resident (R)119, R15, R64, and R70) of six residents reviewed for hospitalization . Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Transfer/Discharge Notice dated 11/01/22 revealed for the Emergent Transfers to Acute Care section, the facility will send a written notice of discharge to the resident and/or resident representative when the resident was transferred/discharged to the hospital. 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657Jul 21, 2023
Based on family interview, staff interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to invite 1 out of 50 resident (Resident #46) or their Responsible Representative (RR) to attend their person-centered care plan meeting. The findings included: Resident #46 was originally admitted to the nursing facility on 05/14/21. Diagnosis for Resident #46 included but not limited to acute subdural hemorrhage, dementia with behavioral disturbance and anxiety. The Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment protocol) an annual assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/28/23 coded Resident #46 with a 03 out of a possible score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating severe cognitive impairment. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF760Jul 21, 2023
Based on staff interviews, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 59 residents (Resident #236) in the survey sample were free of significant medication errors. The findings included: The facility staff failed to ensure the significant medication Lopressor (used to treat high blood pressure) 25 mg was administered twice a day to Resident #326 from 11/14/20 through 11/20/20. Resident #236 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and transferred to an acute care setting on 11/24/20. The resident did not return to the nursing facility. Diagnosis included but are not limited to Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) and Hypertension (high blood pressure). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF580Jul 21, 2023
Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to immediately inform the physician of the need to assess/evaluate, start, or alter treatment when there was a significant deterioration in the resident's condition for 1 of 59 residents (Resident #46) in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #46 had four (4) falls between 04/24/23 - 05/22/23 and during that time she had behavioral and neurological changes. She was at risk for major injury related to being on an anticoagulation medication (blood thinner), independent with ambulation, and a diagnosis of dementia. The resident was not assessed after significant behavioral and neurological changes were identified. […]
Read 27 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 27 of 121 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 21, 2023Standard and complaint9 findings
- Aug 26, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Aug 18, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Jun 11, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Dec 12, 2019Complaint3 findings
- Oct 24, 2019Standard and complaint32 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 30, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Jul 13, 2018Standard and complaint7 findings · 2 harm
Show the 9 earlier surveys
- Feb 3, 2017Standard7 findings · 2 harm
- Jan 14, 2016Standard and complaint18 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 29, 2015Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 14, 2014Standard and complaint14 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 1, 2013—7 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 15, 2012—1 finding
- Feb 2, 2012—5 findings
- Jul 22, 2011—6 findings
- Sep 17, 2010—5 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction