Deficiency Index

Signature Healthcare at Jefferson Place Rehab & We

Louisville, Kentucky · CCN 185349

14 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
54
Surveys
14
Harm or worse
7
Immediate jeopardy
5
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy5

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file11/14

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
96
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE
County
Jefferson
Medicare-certified since
1992

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jun 18, 2025

509 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.883.61
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.96—
Annual nurse turnover27.9%45.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD650.0%E325.0%F325.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 12 of the 54 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5582×

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6561×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6771×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Signature Healthcare at Jefferson Place Rehab & We, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jun 18, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility policy, it was determined the facility failed to serve food under sanitary conditions. Dietary Aide (DA)2 failed to perform hand hygiene after touching various items, and prior to serving food. In addition, DA2 failed to wear a finger cot over a wound to prevent possible contamination while handling food. The findings include: Review of the facility policy Food Preparation dated 09/2017, revealed all staff will practice proper handwashing techniques and glove use. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Sep 18, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food under sanitary conditions and in accordance with professional standards for food safety. Initial tour of the facility revealed opened and undated containers of salad dressing in the walk-in refrigerator. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Labeling and Dating Policy, dated 2017, revealed proper labeling and dating ensured all foods were stored, rotated, and utilized in a first in, first out manner. This helped minimize waste and ensured items past their due date were discarded. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Sep 18, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program that ensured a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment for the prevention of communicable diseases and infections. Observations during the survey revealed direct care staff, housekeeping staff, compassionate care staff, and one (1) resident did not consistently utilize masks and/or eye protection, as currently required when working in, or traveling through resident care areas. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF558Sep 18, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure reasonable accommodations for one (1) of seventy-four (74) sampled residents (Resident) #79, on two (2) occasions. Observations of Resident #79 during survey revealed the call light button out of reach of the resident. The findings include: The facility did not provide a policy for accommodation of residents' needs. Review of Resident #79's medical records revealed the facility admitted the resident on 10/27/2020 with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of Resident #79's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the facility assessed the resident as absent of the spoken word and somewhat had the ability to understand others. […]

Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 54 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 18, 2025Standard1 finding
  • Sep 18, 2021Infection control3 findings
  • Sep 8, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Sep 27, 2019Complaint5 findings · 2 harm
  • Mar 8, 2019Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Nov 21, 2018Complaint5 findings · 5 harm
  • Dec 15, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 8, 2015Standard6 findings
Show the 6 earlier surveys
  • Nov 12, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 7, 2014Standard4 findings
  • Jul 19, 2013—10 findings
  • Dec 11, 2012—2 findings
  • Jun 7, 2012—2 findings
  • May 13, 2011—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction