Deficiency Index

Grayson Nursing and Rehab Center

Leitchfield, Kentucky · CCN 185177

24 surveys since 2010, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
73
Surveys
24
Harm or worse
6
Immediate jeopardy
6
The record, 2010–2024
’10’15’20’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy6

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file23/24

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
72
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
ENCORE HEALTH PARTNERS
County
Grayson · rural
Medicare-certified since
1985

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
3
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=6, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Nov 21, 2024

718 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.953.61
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.57—
Annual nurse turnover37.1%45.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$9,090 across 4 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD—E—F1100.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 1 of the 73 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Grayson Nursing and Rehab Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Nov 21, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Observation of the kitchen on [DATE], revealed Cook1's hair net was not properly covering her hair while she was preparing food trays at the holding table. Additional observations of the kitchen, revealed refrigerator1 contained expired food and food that was not sealed after opening. Further, other kitchen refrigerators and freezers contained food that had been opened, but was not sealed or covered when stored. Furthermore, the kitchen dry storage area, revealed a box of spaghetti noodles in the original container, which was opened and not sealed when stored. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656Jul 19, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy, it was determined the facility failed to implement interventions for six (6) residents of eleven (11) residents (Residents #1, #2, and #3). Resident #1, #2, and #3 related to the implementation of fall interventions in care plans; Resident #5 related to 1:1 care plan supervision interventions not being implemented. Additionally, Residents #8 and Resident #9's medications were administered outside the before and after hour window. The findings include: Review of facility policy, undated and titled, Care Planning & Implementation policy, revealed the purpose of the policy was to ensure all services required by the resident, while considering their rights, to maintain their highest and most practical well-being. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689Jul 19, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' environment remained free of accidents/hazards, ensured adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for six (6) residents in a sampled size of ten (10) residents. Resident #1, #2, #3 had falls with interventions that were observed not implemented. Resident #5 had been involved in a resident-to-resident altercation and was placed on 1:1 supervision with supervision not in affect. Resident # 8 and Resident # 9, medications were given outside physician ordered time frames. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF658Jul 19, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice related to notification of medications given outside the prescribed time for Resident #8 and Resident #9. The findings include: Review of policy that facility utilized for Professional Standards, titled Gerontologist Nursing by Mosby 2nd ed., revealed The Seven Rights: Rules for Giving Medications revealed the seven (7) rights for giving medications were the same no matter who was giving them. The rules or seven rights for giving medication administration were the right drug, the right dose, the right patient, the right route, the right time, the right technique, the right documentation. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF760Jul 19, 2021

    Based on observation, interview,record review, and review of facility policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications were administered within the prescribers order for two (2) residents (Resident #8 and Resident #9). During observation of medication administration pass on 07/13/2021, for Resident #8 and Resident #9, 8:00 AM prescribed medications were given at 9:47 AM and 9:58 AM consecutively. The findings include: Review of facility policy, undated and titled, Medication Pass Schedule, revealed the purpose of the policy was to establish medication pass times. General medication pass times were as follows: 7:00 AM, 11:00 AM, 4:00 PM, 8:00 PM, 12:00 PM, 5:00 PM, 9:00 AM, 1:00 PM and 6:00 PM. […]

Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 73 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Nov 21, 2024Standard1 finding
  • Jul 19, 2021Complaint5 findings
  • Jan 29, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 8, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 28, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 20, 2018Standard9 findings
  • Mar 1, 2018Complaint3 findings
  • Oct 6, 2017Complaint2 findings
Show the 16 earlier surveys
  • Jul 20, 2017Standard3 findings
  • Jan 27, 2017Complaint4 findings
  • Nov 17, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 8, 2016Standard2 findings
  • Aug 14, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 2, 2015Standard4 findings
  • Nov 26, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 11, 2014Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
  • Aug 8, 2014Standard2 findings
  • Jun 6, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • May 8, 2014Standard7 findings
  • Oct 9, 2013—5 findings · 3 harm
  • May 2, 2013—4 findings
  • May 31, 2012—1 finding
  • Feb 9, 2012—2 findings
  • Dec 8, 2010—6 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction