Signature Healthcare at Hillcrest
Owensboro, Kentucky · CCN 185120
19 surveys since 2010, 10 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 53
- Surveys
- 19
- Harm or worse
- 10
- Immediate jeopardy
- 7
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 156
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE
- County
- Daviess
- Medicare-certified since
- 1972
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=7, floor 20).
Last survey on record
May 14, 2026
179 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.67 | 3.73 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.13 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 33.3% | 48.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D133.3% | E— | F266.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Signature Healthcare at Hillcrest, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF657Aug 10, 2021
Based on interview, record review and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Comprehensive Care Plans were reviewed and revised after each Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment or a change in condition for three (3) of three (3) sampled residents (Residents #1, #2 and #3). The facility failed to revise Resident #1, #2 and #3's Comprehensive Care Plan to include the facility's MDS Assessments for two (2) staff assist during bathing and the use of the shower bed. On 02/26/2021, Resident #1 rolled from the shower bed landing onto the floor resulting in a Subdural Hematoma, Closed Bicondyle Fracture of the Right Femur and a six (6) centimeter Laceration of the Frontal Scalp without Foreign Body that required (9) nine staples. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 10, 2021
Based on interview, record review, facility policy review, and manufacturer guideline review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents. On [DATE], Resident #1 fell from a shower bed (gurney) while being assisted by one (1) Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) during a shower, requiring Resident #1 to be transferred to an acute care facility for evaluation and treatment. Resident #1's fall from the shower bed (gurney) resulted in a six (6) centimeter long scalp laceration that required nine (9) staples, a Subdural Hematoma, and a Closed Bicondyle Fracture of the Right Femur. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF908Aug 10, 2021
Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a shower bed was maintained in safe operating condition and documentation of preventative maintenance (PM's) completed for resident care equipment for one (1) resident in a sample of three (3) residents (Resident #1). On [DATE], Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 was providing Resident #1 a shower in a shower bed (gurney). CNA #1 rolled Resident #1 to his/her side to remove clothing. The siderail of the shower bed broke and Resident #1 subsequently fell to the floor. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 14, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety which had the potential to affect residents who consumed meals from the kitchen. Observation of the kitchen, on 05/12/2026 and 05/13/2026, revealed food items uncovered in the freezer, two staff members not wearing a hairnet as required, and alternative food item prepared for lunch service, left uncovered and temped at an unacceptable temperature range (81 Degrees Fahrenheit).Review of the facility's revised policy, titled, Food Preparation, dated 02/2026, revealed all foods were prepared in accordance with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 18, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for all resident(s) in the facility. 1. Observation in the kitchen revealed staff with their hair nets not covering their hair as required. 2. Observation of the kitchen revealed multiple food items that were not covered in the freezer, food items in the refrigerator out of date per the manufacturer's use-by date. Continued observation revealed multiple food items dated with only a month and day and did not include the year for reference. Observation of metal pans revealed they were removed from cleaning and stacked without allowing sufficient dry time. […]
Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 53 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 14, 2026Standard1 finding
- Apr 18, 2025Standard and complaint2 findings
- Aug 10, 2021Complaint4 findings · 3 harm
- Dec 17, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Nov 15, 2018Standard5 findings
- Apr 18, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Aug 25, 2016Standard3 findings
- Oct 13, 2015Complaint2 findings
Show the 11 earlier surveys
- Aug 21, 2015Standard1 finding
- Feb 20, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Jun 19, 2014Standard4 findings
- Oct 24, 2013—2 findings
- Jun 20, 2013—7 findings
- Oct 12, 2012Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
- Apr 28, 2012—5 findings · 4 harm
- Jan 31, 2012—2 findings
- Sep 12, 2011—1 finding
- Mar 24, 2011—6 findings
- Oct 19, 2010—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- NHC Healthcare, GlasgowGlasgowno harm findings
- Parkview Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterPaducahno harm findings
- Signature Healthcare at North Hardin Rehab & WellnRadcliffno harm findings
- Harlan Health and Rehabilitation CenterHarlan3 harm findings
- Greenwood Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterBowling Green2 harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction