Deficiency Index

Shaker Gardens Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Shaker Heights, Ohio · CCN 366021

24 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
76
Surveys
24
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
3
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy3

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file17/24

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
50
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
LIONSTONE CARE
County
Cuyahoga
Medicare-certified since
1995

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 188 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Ohio.

Last survey on record

Jul 16, 2026

116 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.183.57
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.88—
Annual nurse turnover40.8%46.9%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$25,495 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ15.6%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1161.1%E316.7%F316.7%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 18 of the 76 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F7592×

    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.

  • F5691×

    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.

  • F5781×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

  • F6221×

    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Shaker Gardens Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jul 16, 2026

    THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY.Based on closed medical record review, interviews, local police report review, hospital record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent a resident, with altered mental status and a history of wandering behaviors, from leaving the facility without staff knowledge. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious life-threatening harm, injury, and/or death when on 05/26/26 at approximately 9:35 P.M., Resident #48 left the facility without staff knowledge and was later found by the local police approximately five miles away. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF921May 1, 2026

    Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an adequate supply of washcloths and towels were available for resident care needs. This had the potential to affect all 46 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 46.Findings include:Observation and interview with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #299 on 05/01/26 at 8:28 A.M. revealed there were no washcloths or towels were available on the first floor for resident care needs.Observation on 05/01/26 at 8:48 A.M. outside the laundry room revealed 26 bags of dirty laundry and three bags of clean laundry pending delivery to residents. Interview with Maintenance Director (MD) #200 at that time revealed only one clothes washer was operational. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF814May 2, 2022

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the dumpsters and surrounding areas were maintained and free from trash and debris. This had the potential to affect all 42 residents currently residing in the facility. Finding include: Observation on 04/26/22 at 10:42 A.M. of the outside dumpsters revealed two dumpsters, both with the lids open with a moderate to a large amount of debris and trash on ground around the dumpsters. Interview on 04/26/22 at 10:42 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #536 verified the observation.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880May 2, 2022

    Based on observations, staff interview, record review, review of facility infection control policies and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website the facility failed to implement infection control procedures for Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). This had the potential to affect all 42 residents currently residing in the facility. The facility also failed to ensure [CONDITION(S)] (TB) testing was completed as required. This affected two (Residents #30 and #38) of five residents reviewed for TB testing. Findings include: 1. Observation on 04/25/22 at 7:13 P.M. revealed on the third floor, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #631 with her facemask pulled down exposing her mouth and nose. LPN #631 was standing at the medication cart that was in front of the nurses' station. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF804Jan 11, 2022

    Based on interview, observation and review of temperature logs the facility failed to ensure foods were served at a palatable and appetizing temperature. This affected 39 of 41 residents who take food by mouth. Findings include: Interviews with Residents #3, #18 and #35 on 01/10/22 between 8:35 A.M. and 8:50 A.M. revealed taste and temperature of the food was not palatable. The residents reported sometimes the staff just microwave it before serving the food. On 01/10/22 at 8:19 A.M. tray line was observed for the breakfast meal. All meals were served in three compartment, clear plastic containers with attached lids. Interview with Cook #230 on 01/10/22 at 8:25 A.M. indicated the facility was using disposable items due to having COVID 19 positive residents in the building. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 76 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 16, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • May 1, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 17, 2024Standard1 finding
  • Mar 6, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 13, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 10, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 17, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • May 2, 2022Standard and complaint11 findings
Show the 16 earlier surveys
  • Jan 11, 2022Complaint4 findings
  • Nov 23, 2020Infection control1 finding · 1 harm
  • May 22, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Nov 20, 2018Complaint4 findings
  • Oct 6, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 12, 2018Standard5 findings
  • Feb 7, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 22, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 23, 2017Standard2 findings
  • Nov 24, 2015Standard3 findings
  • Jan 21, 2015Standard11 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 19, 2013—5 findings
  • Aug 6, 2013—1 finding
  • Jul 5, 2012—12 findings
  • Jun 11, 2012—1 finding
  • Apr 21, 2011Standard3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction