Deficiency Index

Seneca Hill Manor Inc

Oswego, New York · CCN 335815

14 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
61
Surveys
14
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file9/14

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
120
Ownership
Non profit - Other
Chain
Independent
County
Oswego
Medicare-certified since
1999

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=9, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Apr 14, 2026

209 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.523.84
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.60—
Annual nurse turnover40.6%41.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD10100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 10 of the 61 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Seneca Hill Manor Inc, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF609Apr 14, 2026

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to report timely, verbal and physical abuse for one (1) of three (3) residents (Residents #1) reviewed, resulting in the alleged perpetrator having continued access to residents. Specifically, on 04/02/2026 at approximately 5:30 PM, Certified Nurse Aide #2 alleged they witnessed Certified Nurse Aide #1 handling and speaking to Resident #1 roughly during care. On 04/02/2026, Certified Nurse Aide #1 continued to have access to residents and worked until the end of their shift at 10:00 PM. Certified Nurse Aide #2 did not report the incident until 04/03/2026 at approximately 2:30 PM. Resident #1 was not assessed until 04/03/2026 at approximately 8:00 PM. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF677Oct 9, 2024

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 10/3/2024-10/9/2024, the facility did not ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 3 of 4 residents (Residents #25, #53, and #86) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #86 was not provided timely toileting assistance; Resident #53 was not provided nail care, facial hair care, or a weekly shower as planned; and Resident #25 was not provided their offloading boots (used to lessen pressure on the feet) as planned. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF730Oct 9, 2024

    Based on record review and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 10/3/2024-10/9/2024, the facility did not ensure performance reviews for certified nurse aides were completed at least once every 12 months for 2 of 2 Certified Nurse Aides (Certified Nurse Aides #1 and #2) reviewed. Specifically, Certified Nurse Aides #1 and #2 did not have performance evaluations documented at least once every 12 months. Findings included: The facility Certified Nurse Aide job description dated 6/11/2020, documented the certified nurse aide reported to the Nurse Manager and was responsible for providing individual and comprehensive resident care in accordance with and under the supervision of licensed personnel. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF656Nov 9, 2023

    Based on record review and interview during the abbreviated Survey (NY00310806), the facility did not implement a person-centered care plan with measurable objectives, time frames, and appropriate interventions for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1 was identified at risk for falls and no fall prevention interventions were included on their care plan. The resident was left unattended in the bathroom and was found on the floor with a minor injury. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Nov 9, 2023

    Based on record review and interview during the abbreviated survey (NY00326356), the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #2). Specifically, Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with a cholecystostomy tube (tube that drains fluid from the gallbladder) and there was no documentation: - a treatment was ordered to the cholecystostomy insertion site until the surgical provider ordered one 13 days after admission. - Parameters were specified for cholecystostomy drainage to determine when the medical provider should be notified of inadequate drainage. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 61 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 14, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 9, 2024Standard2 findings
  • Nov 9, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • May 19, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • May 10, 2023Infection control1 finding
  • Oct 4, 2022Standard2 findings
  • Jan 16, 2020Standard3 findings
  • Sep 7, 2018Standard and complaint2 findings
Show the 6 earlier surveys
  • Apr 3, 2017Standard6 findings
  • Jan 8, 2016Standard10 findings
  • Nov 21, 2014Standard10 findings
  • Oct 24, 2013—11 findings
  • Aug 2, 2012—3 findings
  • May 19, 2011—7 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction