Clifton Springs Hospital and Clinic Extended Care
Clifton Springs, New York · CCN 335361
13 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 47
- Surveys
- 13
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 108
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- ROCHESTER REGIONAL HEALTH
- County
- Ontario
- Medicare-certified since
- 1972
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=12, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Nov 15, 2024
724 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.09 | 3.84 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.65 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 46.4% | 41.3% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D975.0% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B325.0% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F5802×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6231×
Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
- F6251×
Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
- F6561×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Clifton Springs Hospital and Clinic Extended Care, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF580Nov 15, 2024
Based on interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 11/07/2024 to 11/15/2024, for one (Resident #93) of nine residents reviewed, the facility did not ensure that the medical team was notified in a timely manner following a significant medication error. Specifically, the medical team was not notified timely when a medication had not been administered according to physician's orders resulting in potentially serious side effects. This is evidenced by the following: The facility policy Event Reporting revised October 2023, documented the definition of an error was a mistake in process that was made, regardless of impact to the patient, that should not have been present and caused harm. Examples of errors includes medication variances. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF656Nov 15, 2024
Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 11/07/2024 to 11/15/2024, for three (Residents' #16, #43, and #86) of 23 residents reviewed, the facility did not develop and/or implement comprehensive person-centered care plans that included measurable goals and interventions to meet the residents' medical, nursing, and psychosocial needs as identified in their comprehensive assessments. Specifically, the comprehensive care plan for Resident #16 did not include goals or interventions related to their respiratory function and tracheostomy (a surgically created opening in the neck and into the windpipe to help with breathing and remove secretions). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF658Nov 15, 2024
Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 11/07/2024 to 11/15/2024, the facility did not ensure that services were provided to meet professional standards of quality for one (Resident #93) of two residents reviewed during medication administration pass. Specifically, Resident #93 had a medication signed off as administered but was omitted during the observed medication pass. Additionally, Resident #93 had multiple doses of a medication that had been signed off as administered, but were not administered, due to not being available, with no evidence that the medical team had been notified. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Nov 15, 2024
Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 11/07/2024 to 11/15/2024, for one (Resident #16) of nine residents reviewed, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Specifically, Resident #16 was identified to be a high risk for aspiration (accidental inhalation of food or drink into the airway) that required full supervision with meals and was observed not supervised at mealtime. This is evidenced by the following: The facility policy Aspiration Precautions/Dysphagia dated March 2024, included residents with dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and/or at risk for aspiration are assessed and appropriate resident centered interventions are incorporated into the resident's care plan. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Mar 3, 2023
Based on observations, interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey completed on 3/3/23, it was determined that for two of six residents reviewed for accidents, the facility did not ensure that the resident's environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible. Specifically, Resident #36 was not appropriately assessed, and care planned to have medications left at their bedside for self- administration and Resident # 28 was served and consumed a meal tray that contained an inaccurate diet consistency. This is evidenced by the following: 1.Resident #36 had diagnoses including end stage renal disease requiring dialysis, hypertension, diabetes, and depression. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 47 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Nov 15, 2024Standard5 findings
- Mar 3, 2023Standard1 finding
- May 18, 2021Standard6 findings
- Mar 13, 2019Standard3 findings
- Apr 9, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Oct 27, 2017Standard4 findings
- Aug 8, 2016Standard3 findings
- Dec 16, 2015Complaint2 findings
Show the 5 earlier surveys
- Jul 31, 2015Standard2 findings
- Sep 5, 2014Standard1 finding
- Aug 21, 2013—6 findings
- Aug 15, 2012—7 findings
- Jul 19, 2011—6 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction