Deficiency Index

Bethany Nursing Home & Health Related Facility Inc

Horseheads, New York · CCN 335645

13 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
72
Surveys
13
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file10/13

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
122
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Chemung
Medicare-certified since
1981

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
5
Staffing
4
Quality measures
1

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=7, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Mar 21, 2025

598 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.533.84
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.60—
Annual nurse turnover48.7%41.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD342.9%E228.6%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B228.6%C—
CMS’s current file: 7 of the 72 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Bethany Nursing Home & Health Related Facility Inc, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF836Mar 24, 2023

    Based on observations and interview conducted during the Recertification Survey completed on 3/24/23, it was determined that the facility did not ensure compliance with all applicable State codes. Specifically, the facility was not in compliance with section 915 of the 2015 edition of the International Fire Code as adopted by New York State, which requires the use of carbon monoxide detection in a building that has fuel-burning appliances. The findings are: Observations on 3/24/23 at 11:52 a.m. included two natural gas-powered dryers located in the skilled 3 ground-floor laundry room, and there were no carbon monoxide detectors within or in the vicinity of the laundry area. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF585Jul 23, 2021

    Based on interviews and record reviews conducted during a Recertification Survey, completed on 7/23/21, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that prompt efforts were made to resolve resident grievances for six of six (Residents #6, #26, #39, #55, #80 and #81) residents reviewed. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that concerns and issues, identified by residents on a Resident Council Precautionary Isolation Questionnaire provided to residents (in place of resident council meetings during COVID-19), completed April 2021 through June 2021, were addressed. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF578Mar 21, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 03/17/2025 to 03/21/2025, the facility did not ensure that all residents had the right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, and to formulate an advance directive (a resident's preferences for medical interventions in the event of a life-threatening episode) that would be honored for one (1) (Residents #89) of 32 residents reviewed for advanced directives. Specifically, the facility did not ensure that Resident #89's advanced directives preferences were consistently identified. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF657Mar 24, 2023

    Based on observations, interviews and record review conducted during a Recertification Survey completed on 3/24/23, it was determined that for one (Resident #46) of three residents reviewed for skin conditions, the facility did not revise the resident's care plan to reflect the resident's current needs. Specifically, Resident #46's Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Kardex (care plan used by CNA for daily care) was not revised to include the presence of recurring skin issues with related goals, and interventions to prevent such. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Mar 24, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey completed on 3/24/23, the facility did not ensure that each resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 20 residents reviewed for quality of care. Specifically, Resident #64 was not provided positioning devices for their [NAME] chair (specialized wheelchair), per therapy recommendations and the residents Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP). […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 72 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 21, 2025Standard3 findings
  • Mar 24, 2023Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Jul 23, 2021Standard1 finding
  • Aug 20, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 18, 2019Standard8 findings
  • Aug 25, 2017Standard9 findings
  • Jun 10, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Apr 10, 2015Standard8 findings
Show the 5 earlier surveys
  • Mar 7, 2014Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Feb 15, 2013—7 findings
  • May 4, 2012—8 findings
  • Mar 28, 2012—1 finding
  • Apr 21, 2011—10 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction