Sayville Nursing And Rehabilitation Center
Sayville, New York · CCN 335761
17 surveys since 2012, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 66
- Surveys
- 17
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 180
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- CARERITE CENTERS
- County
- Suffolk
- Medicare-certified since
- 1992
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=10, floor 20).
Last survey on record
May 2, 2025
556 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.23 | 3.37 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.51 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 22.5% | 33.3% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1083.3% | E216.7% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Sayville Nursing And Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF725Oct 10, 2024
Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 10/3/2024 and completed on 10/10/2024, the facility did not ensure sufficient nursing staff were available to provide nursing services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This was identified for two of the two units reviewed for the Sufficient Nursing Staffing Task. Specifically, 1) a review of the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report Quarter 2, 2024 (January 1 - March 31) indicated excessively low weekend staffing; 2) a review of the daily staffing sheets revealed the facility did not provide sufficient numbers of Certified Nursing Assistants as indicated in the facility assessment; and 3) during the Resident Council… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF838Oct 10, 2024
Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 10/3/2024 and completed on 10/10/2024, the facility did not ensure its Facility Assessment considered specific staffing needs for each resident unit (first floor and second floor) in the facility. Specifically, the Facility Assessment, last updated June 2024, did not include a breakdown of staffing needs for each of the facility's two units. The finding is: The facility's policy, titled Facility Assessment, dated 9/26/2024, documented a facility assessment is conducted at least annually and as needed to determine and update the facility's capacity to meet the needs of and competently care for residents during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF600May 2, 2025
Based on interviews and record review during an abbreviated survey (Complaint Number: NY00371931), the facility did not ensure resident rights to be free from neglect. Specifically, one (Resident #2) of three residents reviewed for neglect, required two-person assistance for mechanical lift (Hoyer) for transfers as documented in the Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP). A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #2) neglected to implement the Comprehensive Care Plan. Certified Nursing Assistant #2 placed a Hoyer sling under Resident #2 by themselves and proceeded to transfer Resident #2 alone. This negligence resulted in Resident #2 's being lowered to the floor. Resident #2 was transferred to the hospital and diagnosed with a contusion. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF692Oct 10, 2024
Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 10/3/2024 and completed on 10/10/2024, the facility did not ensure that each resident was offered sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and health. This was identified for one (Resident #127) of two residents reviewed for Hydration. Specifically, Resident #127 received intravenous hydration for 72 hours due to an elevated blood urea nitrogen level (an abnormal blood test result that could indicate dehydration). The resident's nutritional assessment indicated the resident needed 1620 milliliters of fluid per day. The meal tray observation indicated the resident was not offered an adequate amount of fluids as indicated in the nutritional assessment. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF695Oct 10, 2024
Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 10/3/2024 and completed on 10/10/2024, the facility did not provide proper respiratory treatments and care consistent with professional standards of practice. This was identified for one (Resident #38) of three residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. Specifically, Resident #38 was utilizing oxygen therapy for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and did not have a physician's order for the oxygen therapy. The finding is: The policy and procedure for Oxygen Administration dated January 2020 documented the administration of supplemental oxygen is an essential element of appropriate management for a wide range of clinical conditions. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 66 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 2, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Oct 10, 2024Standard5 findings
- Mar 13, 2023Standard4 findings
- Nov 9, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Sep 15, 2020Standard2 findings
- Jul 25, 2019Complaint1 finding
- May 10, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Nov 20, 2018Standard6 findings
Show the 9 earlier surveys
- Aug 13, 2018Complaint1 finding
- May 12, 2017Standard7 findings
- Apr 11, 2016Standard13 findings
- May 8, 2015Standard4 findings
- May 2, 2014Standard4 findings
- Sep 18, 2013—1 finding
- Apr 26, 2013—8 findings
- Jan 25, 2013Complaint1 finding
- Apr 12, 2012—6 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction