Deficiency Index

Queens Boulevard Extended Care Facility

Woodside, New York · CCN 335791

9 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
24
Surveys
9
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2024
’11’15’20’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file6/9

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
280
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Independent
County
Queens
Medicare-certified since
1995

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
2
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=11, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jun 21, 2024

871 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.723.37
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.02—
Annual nurse turnover39.8%33.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1191.7%E18.3%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 12 of the 24 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Queens Boulevard Extended Care Facility, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF804Jun 21, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 06/13/2024 to 06/21/2024, the facility did not ensure that food was served at an appetizing temperature during meal service. This was evident for 2 (5th and 6th floor) of 2 units observed during dining observation. Specifically, food served during lunch meal service were not maintained at palatable and appetizing temperatures. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Communal Dining with a revision date of 04/10/2024 documented the purpose of the policy was to enhance the quality of life through the provision of nourishing, palatable, attractive meals that meet the residents' daily nutritional needs in a communal dining experience. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF610Jun 21, 2024

    Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated Survey (NY00340566) from 06/13/2024 to 06/21/2024, the facility did not ensure that all allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated. This was evident for 1 (Resident #164) of 2 residents reviewed for abuse out of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that an investigation was conducted for Resident #164, who complained of being roughly handled by a Certified Nursing Assistant during care. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF638Jun 21, 2024

    Based on record review and staff interview conducted during the Recertification Survey from 06/13/2024 to 06/21/2024, the facility did not ensure that a resident was assessed using the quarterly review instrument specified by the State and approved by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services not less frequently than once every 3 months. This was evident for 1 (Resident #107) of 2 residents reviewed for Resident Assessment out of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #107's quarterly assessment was not completed. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF658Jun 21, 2024

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 06/13/2024 to 06/21/2024, the facility did not ensure that services provided or arranged by the facility met professional standards of quality. This was evident for 2 (Resident #85 and #20) of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1.) Resident #85 was observed with oxygen via nasal cannula with no physician's order. 2.) Resident #20 had physician's order to notify the physician when Resident's finger stick blood sugar (method of drawing drops of blood from the finger for testing the blood glucose level) result is less than 70 milligrams per deciliter or more than 400 milligrams per deciliter. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF578May 25, 2022

    Based on interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification survey from 05/18/22 to 05/25/22, the facility did not ensure a resident was provided information to formulate advanced directives (AD). This was evident for 1 (Resident #417) of 1 resident reviewed for ADs out of a sample of 37 resident reviewed. Specifically, there was no documented evidence Resident #417 received education and formulated ADs. The findings are: The facility policy titled Advance Directives dated October 21, 2008, documented the Social Worker (SW) will discuss and distribute to all new resident and/or Designated Representatives, information about Advance directives; and document that information was given. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 24 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 21, 2024Standard and complaint4 findings
  • May 25, 2022Standard7 findings
  • Aug 9, 2019Standard1 finding
  • Oct 16, 2017Standard4 findings
  • Jul 22, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Dec 3, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • May 31, 2013—1 finding
  • Apr 11, 2012—1 finding
Show the 1 earlier survey
  • Mar 25, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction