Sanford Hillsboro Care Center
Hillsboro, North Dakota · CCN 355061
16 surveys since 2011, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 54
- Surveys
- 16
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 34
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- SANFORD HEALTH
- County
- Traill · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1978
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 42 not-for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in North Dakota.
Last survey on record
Jun 26, 2025
501 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.52 | 4.29 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.76 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 38.6% | 50.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $42,488 across 2 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K110.0% | L— |
| Actual harm | G110.0% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D770.0% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C110.0% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6582×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F5781×
Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
- F6231×
Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
- F6571×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Sanford Hillsboro Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF689Jun 5, 2024
1. Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an environment free of accident hazards for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #27) who experienced a burn related to hot coffee. Failure to ensure appropriate coffee/water temperatures resulted in Resident #27 sustaining a burn and placed all residents at risk for serious burns/injuries. During the on-site recertification survey, the team consulted with the State Survey Agency (SSA) and determined an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation existed on 05/28/24 at 6:20 p.m. The IJ resulted from temperature readings obtained from the coffee/hot water machine, a lack of temperature monitoring by staff, and an injury to a resident. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Nov 2, 2023
Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to provide necessary supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #1) with a burn. Failure to ensure placement of a barrier between the resident's skin and the heating pack and monitor the resident resulted in a burn to Resident #1's shoulder. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Heat Applications occurred on 11/02/23. This policy, dated 11/29/22, stated, . Procedure: Microwave Heating Packs . Place pack in microwave and follow manufacturer's recommendations for setting and length of heating time. Cover pack with towel and place on treatment area of resident . Check area in one minute for any redness of skin . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Feb 17, 2022
Based on observation, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standard infection control practices for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #3 and #281) on isolation. Failure to follow infection control practices related to proper procedure for personal protective equipment (PPE) usage and isolation signage may result in the spread of infection to residents, staff, and/or visitors. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Emerging Threats-Acute Respiratory Syndromes Coronavirus (COVID) occurred on 02/17/22. This policy, revised 02/08/22, stated, . Upon identification of any resident with suspected or positive COVID-19, a COVID-19 precautions sign indicating precaution type and PPE will be posted on the outside of the resident's room. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF886Feb 17, 2022
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to document required COVID-19 test documentation for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #3, #5, and #281). Failure to document COVID-19 testing results in each resident's medical record may lead to a lack of further required interventions and/or an incomplete medical record. Findings include: Review of resident medical records occurred on 02/15/22 and showed Resident #3, #5, and #281's records failed to contain documentation of negative COVID-19 test results. During an interview on 02/15/22 at 10:42 a.m., an administrative nurse (#1) confirmed the facility failed to ensure all resident medical records contained documentation of negative COVID-19 test results.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF641Jan 27, 2021
Based on record review, review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual (Version 1.16), and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) accurately reflected the resident's status for 5 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #13, #14, #18, #26, and #27). Failure to accurately complete the MDS does not allow each resident's assessment to reflect their current status/needs, and has the potential to affect the accurate development of a comprehensive care plan and the care provided to the residents. Findings include: SECTION H: BLADDER AND BOWEL The Long-Term Care Facility RAI Manual, revised October 2018, pages H-3-6 , . Steps for Assessment: H0200A, Trail of a Toileting Program . […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 54 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 19, 2026Standard2 findings
- Jun 26, 2025Standard3 findings
- Jun 5, 2024Standard6 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 2, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 17, 2022Standard6 findings
- Jan 27, 2021Standard3 findings
- Apr 10, 2019Standard1 finding
- Apr 19, 2018Standard3 findings
Show the 8 earlier surveys
- Mar 1, 2017Standard4 findings
- Mar 16, 2016Standard4 findings
- Mar 5, 2015Standard7 findings
- Nov 5, 2014Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 29, 2014—1 finding
- Jan 24, 2013—2 findings
- Feb 2, 2012—5 findings
- Mar 9, 2011—4 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction