Good Samaritan Society - Oakes
Oakes, North Dakota · CCN 355095
22 surveys since 2010, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 118
- Surveys
- 22
- Harm or worse
- 5
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 46
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY
- County
- Dickey · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1991
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 42 not-for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in North Dakota.
Last survey on record
Jun 18, 2026
144 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.23 | 4.29 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.80 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 50.0% | 50.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $8,281 across 1 penalty
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J15.3% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1578.9% | E15.3% | F15.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C15.3% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6862×
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F5841×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
- F6001×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Good Samaritan Society - Oakes, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Oct 15, 2025
Based on record review, review of facility policy, staff interview, and review of a Vulnerable Adult Protective Services (VAPS) report, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from abuse for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #1 and #2) who experienced nonconsensual sexual contact. Failure to protect residents from sexual abuse placed all residents at risk for psychosocial harm, physical harm, and mental and emotional distress. This citation is considered past non-compliance based on the review of the corrective actions the facility implemented immediately following the incident. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Oct 25, 2021
Based on information received from the complainant, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary assistance to prevent an injury for 1 of 1 discharged resident (Resident #2) whose wheelchair tipped backwards while being transported in the facility van. Failure of the facility to ensure staff properly secured Resident #2's wheelchair in the van resulted in the resident experiencing a widening of a C1 [cervical vertebra near base of skull] anterior arch fracture and the development of a posterior arch fracture. Findings include: The complainant alleged the facility failed to properly secure a resident in the facility van which resulted in a fall with injury during transport. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF725Oct 3, 2024
Based on record review, confidential resident and family interviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet the residents' needs for 4 of 4 confidential residents (Resident A, B, C, and D) and family members (Family member #1 and #2). Failure to provide sufficient nursing staff may result in residents experiencing falls, poor hygiene, incontinence, and skin issues and may negatively affect the residents' physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: - Review of Resident A's medical record occurred on 09/30/24 and identified the resident's most recent Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) scored a 15, indicating intact cognition. The care plan stated, . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Oct 3, 2024
40489 Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control practice for 4 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #17, #22, #32 and #39) and 5 supplemental residents (Resident #2, #6, #13, #21, and #31) observed during cares. Failure to follow infection control practices during resident cares related to hand hygiene, glove use, and enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) has the potential to spread infection throughout the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Standard and Transmission -Based Precautions occurred on 10/03/24. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF726Jul 14, 2022
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff were able to locate the necessary equipment and how to operate 2 of 3 suction machines (West Unit). Failure to ensure the suction machines were functional and equipment available placed residents at risk for choking and aspiration. Findings include: Observation on 07/12/22 at 3:36 p.m. showed a supervisory nurse (#3) and two other nurses (#4, and #9) failed to properly set-up and operate the two suction machines located on the West unit. During an interview on 07/12/22 at 3:46 p.m., a supervisory nurse (#3) verified the facility nurses failed to locate supplies and properly set-up the suction machines located on the West unit.
Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 118 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 18, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jan 7, 2026Standard6 findings
- Oct 15, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 7, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Oct 3, 2024Standard8 findings
- Jan 4, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jul 14, 2022Standard7 findings
- Oct 25, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
Show the 14 earlier surveys
- Apr 14, 2021Standard and complaint3 findings
- Oct 28, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Jul 18, 2019Standard4 findings
- Jul 11, 2018Standard8 findings
- May 24, 2017Standard14 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 23, 2016Standard7 findings
- Jun 24, 2015Standard12 findings
- Nov 12, 2014Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 2, 2014Standard12 findings
- Aug 28, 2013—3 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 24, 2013—5 findings
- Jul 25, 2012—4 findings
- Oct 10, 2011—4 findings
- Sep 23, 2010—9 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction