Sanford Health & Rehabilitation Co
Sanford, North Carolina · CCN 345534
30 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2014.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 121
- Surveys
- 30
- Harm or worse
- 20
- Immediate jeopardy
- 10
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 131
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- SANSTONE HEALTH & REHABILITATION
- County
- Lee · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 2005
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 92 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in North Carolina.
Last survey on record
Jul 23, 2026
109 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.82 | 3.49 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.25 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 24.7% | 52.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $10,527 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J12.8% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G25.6% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2363.9% | E925.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B12.8% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F5612×
Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
- F6952×
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
- F7562×
Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
- F7612×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
- F8672×
Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Sanford Health & Rehabilitation Co, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Dec 1, 2022
Based on record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent a severely cognitively impaired resident from exiting the facility unsupervised, failed to ensure the resident was safe in the parking lot, and failed to report that a cognitively impaired resident was in the parking lot for 1 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #59). Resident #59, who was in his wheelchair, was found by Nurse Aide (NA) #1 in the parking lot unsupervised, didn't intervene and then, the resident was found to have gone out to the road. The resident was discovered by the Housekeeper on a 2-lane road where the speed limit was 55 miles per hour (MPH) west bound and was a quarter mile away from the facility's front door. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF760Feb 8, 2021
Based on record review, Physician, Physician Assistant (PA), Nurse Practitioner (NP), Pharmacist and staff interviews, the facility failed to prevent significant medication errors by not administering a medication as ordered, not entering verbal order, not verifying medication orders and not transcribing physician's prescribed medications to the Medication Administration Record (MAR) which resulted in prescribed medications not administered as ordered for 3 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for medication administration (Residents #5, #11 & #12). Resident #5 was prescribed intravenous (IV) [MEDICATION NAME] (an antibiotic drug) for bacteremia (presence of bacteria in the bloodstream) on 1/8/21. [MEDICATION NAME] was not verified and transcribed to the MAR until 1/11/21 and he missed 5 doses. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF760Jun 13, 2024
Based on record review, Medical Director, Nurse Practitioner, staff and resident interviews the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration when two blood pressure (BP) medications, Isosorbide mononitrate and hydralazine were not administered per orders for Resident #1. This resulted in Resident #1 ' s BP to drop to 82/50 causing a near syncope event that required a visit to the emergency room for further evaluation. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF550Dec 1, 2022
Based on record review, observation and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to promote dignity by failing to address resident's repeated request for incontinence care (Resident #60) and by ignoring resident's request and allowing a resident to lay in a wet pad (Resident #51) for 2 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for dignity (Residents #60 & #51). The facility's failure to promote dignity made Resident #60 angry and made Resident #51 feel deserted. The findings included: 1. Resident #60 was admitted to the facility 9/5/2022 with diagnoses that included cerebral infarct (stroke). Resident #60's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the resident was cognitively intact, had clear speech, understood others and could be understood by others. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689May 6, 2021
Based on record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to determine root causes of each fall and to revise the care plan intervention after each fall (Residents #34 & #70) and also failed to put effective interventions in place following each fall to prevent repeated falls (Resident #70). This was evident for 2 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for accidents (Residents # 34 & # 70). Resident #34 ' s falls resulted in abrasions, lump, bruises, pain and emergency room (ER) evaluation. Findings included: 1. Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbances and [CONDITION(S)]/[CONDITION(S)] following cerebro vascular disease. […]
Read 37 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 37 of 121 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 23, 2026Standard4 findings
- Apr 4, 2025Standard1 finding
- Jun 13, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 24, 2024Standard and complaint6 findings
- Dec 1, 2022Standard and complaint23 findings · 2 harm
- Mar 9, 2022Complaint2 findings
- May 6, 2021Standard and complaint10 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 25, 2021Complaint2 findings
Show the 22 earlier surveys
- Feb 8, 2021Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 9, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Dec 13, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Nov 17, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Sep 24, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 8, 2019Standard6 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 28, 2018Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Aug 9, 2018Standard and complaint14 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 15, 2018Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Feb 15, 2018Complaint7 findings · 2 harm
- Oct 11, 2017Complaint5 findings
- Aug 17, 2017Standard3 findings · 1 harm
- May 23, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Jan 25, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Sep 22, 2016Standard2 findings
- Aug 26, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Nov 14, 2015Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 8, 2015Standard3 findings
- Dec 5, 2014Standard4 findings · 3 harm
- Mar 1, 2013—3 findings
- Jan 5, 2012—2 findings
- Dec 1, 2010—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Oak Forest Health and RehabilitationWinston Salem5 harm findings
- Peak Resources - CharlotteCharlotte7 harm findings
- River Trace Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterWashington4 harm findings
- Carolina Rehab Center of CumberlandFayetteville11 harm findings
- Valley Hill Health & Rehab CenterHendersonville5 harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction