Deficiency Index

San Saba Nursing & Rehabilitation

San Saba, Texas · CCN 676399

10 surveys since 2017, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
23
Surveys
10
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2017–2024
’17’20’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file8/10

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
72
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE
County
San Saba · rural
Medicare-certified since
2016

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
1
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=6, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Oct 3, 2024

767 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day2.263.22
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.43—
Annual nurse turnover96.4%53.9%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD266.7%E133.3%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 3 of the 23 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at San Saba Nursing & Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF883Oct 3, 2024

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's medical records included documentation that indicated the resident, or their responsible party, received education of the benefits, and potential side effects, of the influenza or pneumococcal immunization, receipt of the influenza or pneumococcal immunization, or residents did not receive the influenza or pneumococcal immunization due to medical contraindication, or refusal, for 3 (Resident #300, Resident #29, and Resident #37) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF641Jun 7, 2022

    45830 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were accurately completed for four (Residents #1, #2, #3, and #4) of 12 residents reviewed for resident assessments. The MDS Case Manager failed to accurately code Section N (Medications) of the MDS assessment for medications received in a seven-day lookback period for Residents #1, #2, #3, and #4. This failure placed residents at risk of inadequate care due to inaccurate MDS assessments. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Feb 2, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 5 staff (LVN A and MA B) reviewed for the following; 1. LVN A failed to don gloves when administering insulin by injection to Resident #1. 2. MA B failed to sanitize a blood pressure monitor between uses on Residents #1 and #2. 3. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF636Oct 3, 2024

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive, accurate, standardized reproducible assessment of the functional capacity was conducted initially and periodically for one (Resident #300) of five residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #300's comprehensive admission MDS was conducted within 14 days of admission. The due date was on 10/01/2024 and it was not completed. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their care and treatment needs assessed to ensure necessary care and services were provided. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Aug 2, 2023

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for one of 16 residents (Resident #30) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to follow a physician order dated 07/11/23 to increase Resident #30's insulin from eight units to ten units. This failure could place residents at risk of uncontrolled blood sugar and kidney injury. Findings included: Review of the undated face sheet for Resident #30 reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of vascular dementia, type II diabetes mellitus, and long term (current) use of insulin. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 23 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Oct 3, 2024Standard2 findings
  • Aug 2, 2023Standard1 finding
  • Oct 13, 2022Infection control1 finding
  • Jun 7, 2022Standard1 finding
  • Feb 2, 2022Infection control1 finding
  • Aug 13, 2019Standard1 finding
  • Aug 10, 2018Standard2 findings
  • Mar 22, 2018Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
Show the 2 earlier surveys
  • Jan 25, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 26, 2017Standard10 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction